5 ms·
My argument is just that not all laws are good, and following the law does not equate to doing the right thing.
by nv-vn 8y ago
My argument is just that not all laws are good, and following the law does not equate to doing the right thing.
- MBCook 8y agoAnd they’re free to take that position and face the consequences.
- rocqua 8y agoWhilst that is totally correct morally, law enforcement must be very careful about applying that. There is a trade-off between having a stable and predictable set of laws (i.e. strict enforcement) and having room for judgement calls when the letter of the law is unfair (i.e. discretion in enforcement). I understand when regulators decide to side with strict enforcement when a companies only advantage comes from not following the rules. Especially when it is disputed the rules shouldn't be there.