3 ms·
There's a difference between the government funding education and the government funding students. Costs are high because the government funds students (sometim
by rrcaptain 8y ago
There's a difference between the government funding education and the government funding students. Costs are high because the government funds students (sometimes), not education.
And very few people get government scholarships, most get loans which must be repayed: essentially an extra tax on the middle class.
- nostrebored 8y agoGovernment funds most public universities to an absurd degree. Tuition is a drop in the bucket for most schools. Government loans are an extra tax on everyone, and are best seen as a money transfer from all taxpayers to public institutions.
- rrcaptain 8y agoGovernment loans aren't a tax on those who don't need them, who are the very people who should be taxed the most. And states only fund roughly half of school's out of their budgets and that number has decreased in recent years.
- dragonwriter 8y ago> And very few people get government scholarships, Untrue. Lots of people get Pell Grants, but the value of each is very small.
- nostrebored 8y agoGrants and scholarships are different, FWIW. Pell grants can be an extreme amount of money depending on your income bracket, but given the prior knowledge that people at each income bracket will make up the difference in amount (for a service like education), it can be seen as increasing school prices by the highest paid amount.
- rrcaptain 8y agoYes I suppose you're technically correct. But government grants hardly pay for poor people's education, especially considering they trap them in the cycle of being unable to pay for books and food without earning too much to lose the grant.