5 ms·
If by "also tends" you mean "once, as a bug", then yes. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9724409 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9724409 That's a dis
by digitaLandscape 8y ago
If by "also tends" you mean "once, as a bug", then yes.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9724409 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9724409
That's a disingenuous phrasing, though.
- vxNsr 8y agoBased on the link you provided it looks like it's Opt-Out not Opt-In, so it's not really a bug so much as a "feature" that open source software shouldn't have but google wanted to sneak in. based on this link [0] it's pretty clear that they did this intentionally and only changed things after user outcry. I wouldn't call that a bug. [0]https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=491435 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=491435
- msla 8y agoSounds like the opt-out tracking Mozilla put in, or the advertisement for that TV show it spammed which did stupid things to text. It would be nice to have a mainstream browser which didn't try to track, advertise to, or shove "telemetry" into users.
- Dylan16807 8y agoIt wasn't an ad. It shut down before init if you hadn't manually set an about:config value telling it to run. It was set up in a dumb way, but people also grossly misreported. The extension was "enabled" by default but did exactly nothing except shut itself down. The behavior was all disabled by default.
- msla 8y ago> It wasn't an ad. Of course it was. It shilled a TV show.