3 ms·
This was my understanding of Cuba as well, that it was a poor country when it started. I am having trouble finding Cuba's GDP before, or arround, the revolutio
by thecolorblue 8y ago
This was my understanding of Cuba as well, that it was a poor country when it started.
I am having trouble finding Cuba's GDP before, or arround, the revolution in 1953. So take this comment with a grain of salt.
- door4 8y agoGDP growth under socialism was always comparable with capitalist countries. And even despite being a relatively poor country and being under embargo from the US for nearly 70 years, Cuba has a higher literacy rate and life expectancy than the United States. Compare the development of China, which is responsible for nearly all of the poverty reduction of the last 30 years, and India, a similarly situated but more market-oriented economy victim to western Imperialism. It's night and day. I'm not defending any of these regimes (they all certainly had problems), but the argument that socialism "doesn't work" in terms of creating a functional, growing economy is simply not consistent with the historical record. Again, despite controlling most of the global economy and being the wealthiest country in the world, the U.S still doesn't have affordable housing, livable infrastructure, reasonable work environments, and enough food for all its people. Because capitalism never has and never will provide those things.
- toomanybeersies 8y agoCuba's literacy rate apparently went from ~70% to 96% [1] after the revolution due to a concerted push for literacy. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Literacy_Campaign https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Literacy_Campaign