4 ms·
The stopping distance is more than twice as long as for a bus[1], so this actually makes sense. [1] https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/trams
by CaptainZapp 8y ago
The stopping distance is more than twice as long as for a bus[1], so this actually makes sense.
[1] https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/trams-emergency-stop-distance-twice-as-long-as-bus-1-3311653 https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/trams-...
- bigpeopleareold 8y agoI had this thought, so it is interesting that it is confirmed elsewhere. I don't know if it always plays into the fact that the trams in Oslo are actually old (according to Wikipedia, from the 80s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trams_in_Oslo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trams_in_Oslo)
- CaptainZapp 8y agoI think it's pure physics. Trams are much heavier than buses so there would be more mass to be stopped. In addition I think that vehicles running on tracks take longer to stop. I live in Zurich, which runs overall pretty new(ish) trams. Makes no difference. Disclaimer: I was always pretty crap in physics :)
- adrianN 8y agoThe coefficient of friction of rubber on road is much higher than steel on steel.
- seanmcdirmid 8y agoWhich is why trams that go up and down hills use rubber rather than steel (like one in Lausanne).