4 ms·
As an investor since 2012 I think Tesla would be far more operationally efficient private. Also a bit of schadenfreude but I've personally enjoyed watching Wall
by synaesthesisx 8y ago
As an investor since 2012 I think Tesla would be far more operationally efficient private. Also a bit of schadenfreude but I've personally enjoyed watching Wall Street shorts collectively lose hundreds of millions of dollars over this.
- joezydeco 8y agoMight be in the tens of billions before this is all said and done. (~34 million short shares outstanding * $420/share = ~14 billion dollars to cover. Is my math wrong?)
- coltonv 8y agoWouldn't that assume that every short seller would lose $420 per share? They probably purchased their shorts at like ~$350 per share, so they'd only stand to lose 420-350=$70 per share, correct?
- peeters 8y agoI'm a newbie when it comes to calls and puts, couldn't they just fill their shorts now (no pun intended, I seriously don't know the terminology) if they're worried about it? Tesla closed at $370.
- mikec3010 8y agoWhat happens when $14bn in short interest tries to buy simultaneously?
- whataboutism 8y agoIt sounds like everyone will be buying TSLA tomorrow. Even the little guy who wants to earn the difference between $379 and $420.
- jonknee 8y agoSure, but they didn't start from zero. If you sold short at $350 the amount to cover is $70. Options are also a common way to hedge, so it's really hard to say what the total loss would be.
- joezydeco 8y agoTrue. I guess I was looking at the total purchase needed to cover all shares. If there aren’t enough shares available to cover, could the price exceed $420?