4 ms·
Worked for a company that was contracted by DOW to make an app promoting some extremely toxic agrochemicals, such as Forefront. They talked about this being so
by hjek 8y ago
Worked for a company that was contracted by DOW to make an app promoting some extremely toxic agrochemicals, such as Forefront. They talked about this being so poisonious that if animals eat grass sprayed with it, then crops grown with their manure will be unsuitable for human consumption. Was also asked to fake ("round up") the calculations of how much money you'd save if by those chemicals.
Read up a bit about DOW and the Bopal disaster and started to feel horrible about my work.
Tried to gently bring concerns up with the management, and was laid off immediately.
I feel really bad about doing that work, but trying to make up for it by not eating animal products anymore.
- secfirstmd 8y agoWhy not channel your feelings and talk to a journalist, NGO or regulator willing to act in the public interest?
- dabockster 8y agoPeople have been known to disappear for less.
- smnrchrds 8y agoHave they really? It is the sort of thing you see a lot in fiction but not on reality.
- Doxin 8y agoAt the very least you'd end up being sued for defamation or whatnot by DOW for the next century or two. DOW is not a company you want to tango with.
- secfirstmd 8y agoIts fully possible to tip a journalist or regulator these fays with a level of anonymity these days.
- Doxin 8y agoI can fully imagine not wanting to run the risk regardless however.
- krageon 8y agoAnd what if they can tell from the information leaked who leaked it? This person's life will be destroyed by armies of lawyers. Just so some journalist can report on something that'll be out of the news in a few weeks and change precisely nothing.
- secfirstmd 8y agoTrue. That is always a risk when someone does something in the public interest. But doing stuff for the betterment of others at risk of your own lifestyle is a noble endeavour that many have undertaken despite these reasons.
- krageon 8y agoMy point is that others are not bettered by this action, because the action of leaking to a journalist no longer improves anything. Just as it hasn't the last few times this happened. It is arguably a good idea to sacrifice something for everyone's benefit, but it is always a bad idea to sacrifice if nobody benefits.
- hjek 8y agoGood idea. I don't really know anything that isn't already out there, but still happy to talk to any journalists/NGOs/regulators about it. I have been going on about this to a journalist friend of mine who's works at a public broadcaster, but it didn't really go anywhere. Well, at least I'm airing this on HN now. It's made me wary of wild-camping on grassy areas around farms, knowing what some farmers might be spraying there. This is the app: http://uk.dowagro.com/grassland-weed-app-now-available/ http://uk.dowagro.com/grassland-weed-app-now-available/ About the killer compost it creates: https://www.sustainablemarketfarming.com/tag/tomatoes-with-damage-from-triclopyr-herbicide/ https://www.sustainablemarketfarming.com/tag/tomatoes-with-d...
- jliptzin 8y agoHow does not eating animal products help with your guilty conscience in this situation?
- hjek 8y agoAnimal husbandry has a large negative impact on the environment. After this DOW Grassland app I felt I needed to take a look at the environmental destruction I'm contributing to.
- ameixaseca 8y agoExcept the alternative - ie, relying on annuals for food production - destroys top soil and relies on fossil-based fertilizers. It's the epitome of nonsusteinability and environment destruction. Perennials combined with animals can be made into a much more self-sustainable cycle. Be careful with numbers, they can be useful but fail to show the full picture at the same time.
- hjek 8y agoBack when I was eating meat, I was probably still aware that it was harmful, but in a kind of cynical denial about it. I've heard that one about "the annual crops" before, and it's simply not true that it's "the" alternative. It's claimed in this one study that's echoed in loads of articles[0][1][2][3] that assumes that vegans don't eat perennials, which is kind of ignoring the existence of apples, apricots, asparagus, artichoke, avocados, broccoli, currants, basil, blue- and blackberry, chives, fennel, garlic, ginger, grapes, kale, kiwis, leek, mint, onions, oregano, pears, persimmons, pineapples, plums, pomegranates, potato, rasp- and strawberries, radish, rhubarb, rosemary, sage, thyme, tomatoes for a start. This view about animal husbandry being harmless for the environment has been disproven[4][5][6], and is on the line with global warming denialism. [0]: http://qz.com/749443/being-vegan-isnt-as-environmentally-friendly-as-you-think/ http://qz.com/749443/being-vegan-isnt-as-environmentally-fri... [1]: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/earth/going-vegan-isnt-actually-th/ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/earth/going-vegan-isnt-act... [2]: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2016/08/11/new-study-reveals-vegan-diet-not-so-environmentally-friendly.html http://www.foxnews.com/health/2016/08/11/new-study-reveals-v... [3]: https://quietkinetic.wordpress.com/2017/03/09/global-veganism-would-result-in-more-agricultural-land-use/ https://quietkinetic.wordpress.com/2017/03/09/global-veganis... [4]: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/sep/07/food.foodanddrink https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/sep/07/food.foo... [5]: http://www.cowspiracy.com/facts/ http://www.cowspiracy.com/facts/ [6]: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/dec/03/eating-less-meat-curb-climate-change https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/dec/03/eating-l...
- brokenmachine 8y agoYou sound like a good dude, that's why they laid you off because they knew you'd call them on all other shady stuff they'd do in the future as well... I hope karma does happen in the end but I fear it doesn't.
- whatsstolat 8y agoLike the Roundup pun