3 ms·
Wells Fargo has a very long and well-established history of making "mistakes" in their own favor that harm their customers and/or break laws. These "mistakes" a
by dunpeal 8y ago
Wells Fargo has a very long and well-established history of making "mistakes" in their own favor that harm their customers and/or break laws. These "mistakes" are typically non-technical in nature, have nothing to do with engineering standards, and in several cases appear to be a matter of deliberate bank policy:
> On February 2, 2018, the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank barred Wells Fargo from growing its asset base any further, based upon years of misconduct, until Wells Fargo fixes its internal problems to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve. In April 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that the United States Department of Labor had launched a probe into whether Wells Fargo was pushing its customers into more expensive retirement plans as well as into retirement funds managed by Wells Fargo itself. Subsequently in May 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that Wells Fargo's business banking group had improperly altered documents about business clients in 2017 and early 2018.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo
These are just from the past couple of years. Check out their Wikipedia page for many, many more. This isn't even the first time they made serious "mistakes" with mortgages specifically: check out their 2012 settlement. Here's the judgement in just one case:
> On April 5, 2012, a federal judge ordered Wells Fargo to pay $3.1 million in punitive damages over a single loan, one of the largest fines for a bank ever for mortgaging service misconduct. Elizabeth Magner, a federal bankruptcy judge in the Eastern District of Louisiana, cited the bank's behavior as "highly reprehensible", stating that Wells Fargo has taken advantage of borrowers who rely on the bank's accurate calculations. She went on to add, "perhaps more disturbing is Wells Fargo's refusal to voluntarily correct its errors. It prefers to rely on the ignorance of borrowers or their inability to fund a challenge to its demands, rather than voluntarily relinquish gains obtained through improper accounting methods."
Blaming the programmers for these "mistakes" is like blaming bank tellers for the reckless banking policies that caused the 2008 meltdown.
This has nothing to do with "engineering standards". Notice that all these "mistakes" benefit Wells Fargo at the expense of its customers and/or the law. If it was just "shoddy standards", you'd expect a few mistakes to be in favor of the customers...
These "mistakes" proliferate because they make the bank money, and only cost them a slap on the wrist and some small fines. This is Too Big to Fail in action.
- njarboe 8y agoEdit: This comment should have been attached to the parent comment. Sorry about that. I don't expect any internal changes at Wells Fargo, just commenting they are concerned about their image on this issue. Wells Fargo is certainly worried about how the revelation of all of these anti-customer actions might hurt their bottom line. Thus its "Re-Established" brand campaign[1]. Most companies just change their name when they want to "Re-Establish". I'm not sure it is such a good idea to spend a lot of money telling people that you were a bad actor and now, trust us, things are different. [1]https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180507005415/en/Wells-Fargo-Launches-%E2%80%98Re-Established%E2%80%99-New-Brand-Campaign https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180507005415/en/Wel...
- dunpeal 8y agoDon't confuse "public image management" with actual concern. They've been willfully misbehaving for decades, still do so today, and made a ton of money off it. Multiple generations of WF senior managers got nice bonuses from illegal / "mistaken" fees, "mistakes" in servicing mortgages, misleading their customers, etc. Seems like these kind of "mistakes" are thoroughly ingrained into their corporate culture by now. So they also threw some money into a campaign to improve their public image. Makes sense for them. They've also evidently continued their practice of making "mistakes" in their own favor.
- ilaksh 8y agoIt's a criminal organization that should be shut down with executives in prison.