4 ms·
The comment I was replying to stated that n was a "huge number", presumably bigger than 3.
by goodside 8y ago
The comment I was replying to stated that n was a "huge number", presumably bigger than 3.
- Dylan16807 8y agoI'm pretty sure you're reading it wrong. I interpret the comment as saying "it's premature to worry about (finding points in n dimensions where n is large)". This interpretation implies n is not large. Not "it's (premature to worry about finding points in n dimensions) where n is large". This interpretation implies n is large, but that you don't care.