5 ms·
sooo.. If one is anti-globalist, one is inherently anti-semitic? What then does it mean to be a globalist? And further, if defending being a 'globalist' auto
by cat199 8y ago
sooo..
If one is anti-globalist, one is inherently anti-semitic?
What then does it mean to be a globalist?
And further, if defending being a 'globalist' automatically implies 'defending jews' what does this implicitly imply 'all jews' actually believe geopolitically?
the faulty logic runs deep in this line of thinking; the allegedly racist term then becomes 'the reality', which should then be protected..
- api 8y agoYou can be against neoliberalism, unfair trade, or international political entities overriding national sovereignty without being antisemitic. Picking a dog whistle term that happens to sound like a reasonable position is a standard political tactic. Another example: "family values" which is a euphemism for theocracy. Who would actually oppose "the family"?
- ramblerouser 8y agoHow do you describe "international political entities overriding national sovereignty" without using the word "globalist" or "internationalist"? (Both of which are antisemitic apparently)
- api 8y agoThat's exactly why white supremacists picked those terms.
- ramblerouser 8y agoIm asking you what term you think is appropriate. It seems like you dont think ANY word is appropriate, and that is 1984 newspeak. If your opponent isnt allowed to have a word to describe your position, they cant effectively argue against it. edit: Lol. Thank you for validating my theory.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]