The first illustration is terrible. It's making multiple comparisons at the same time, the most prominent being the difference in blade size, which isn't variab

The first illustration is terrible. It's making multiple comparisons at the same time, the most prominent being the difference in blade size, which isn't variable between the 3 technologies the article is actually talking about. Whilst at the same time making it harder to see the pertinent data, differences in the generator size and weight.