4 ms·
So you're basically saying that Weak AI is good enough, and who cares if the machine really understands what it is doing? As if the ever-increasing accuracy num
by henrikschroder 8y ago
So you're basically saying that Weak AI is good enough, and who cares if the machine really understands what it is doing? As if the ever-increasing accuracy numbers somehow move us closer to Strong AI?
- dekhn 8y agoIt's hard to say for certain, but I would say that observed by humans, we'll probably get computers to the point of appearing to be conscious, with minds, passing the most challenging tests we can construct. It seems like a reasonable extrapolation from modern technology. Think about text to speech producing sounds that are hard to distinguish from humans, deepfake producing images that look like they were actually filmed. Those are all weak AI. They don't need strong AI- just tons of labelled data- to produce things that can fool inexperienced humans.