3 ms·
> I wouldn't call it a myth, I'd call it a theory with inadequate evidence to support or refute it. I would call any theory that lacks adequate evidence to sup
by CiPHPerCoder 8y ago
> I wouldn't call it a myth, I'd call it a theory with inadequate evidence to support or refute it.
I would call any theory that lacks adequate evidence to support it a myth.
- throwaway2048 8y agoMore like any theory without evidence that persistently gets presented as fact.
- nradov 8y agoThat's called a hypothesis.
- babypistol 8y agoCalling it a myth implies that there is adequate evidence to refute it. By your reasoning we could also be talking about the Giving-Free-Cash-To-The-Poor-Will-Make-Them-Productive myth.
- tomp 8y agoSo dark energy is just a myth?