4 ms·
> If you invest a few billions dollars to the task, you will have your specialized AI with all the sensors needed to out-perform human at this task in less than
by mieseratte 8y ago
> If you invest a few billions dollars to the task, you will have your specialized AI with all the sensors needed to out-perform human at this task in less than a decade.
Just how much money do you think the USG has invested in this space? DARPA ain't no slouch. In fact, you're using one of their projects to shit-post.
> There is a reason Google employees refused to work for military.
I fail to see what this has to do with anything?
- antpls 8y ago> I fail to see what this has to do with anything? If the Pentagon was going to partner with Google to develop drones, maybe it means the talented people required to develop such tech simply don't want to work in the military field, but they exist elsewhere working on others projects. Money can solve all the material problems, but if people still don't want to work toward autonomous jet fighters or killing machines, then it can explains why it doesn't exist at all.
- nradov 8y agoBoeing, General Atomics, and Lockheed Martin probably have more talented people in that domain. Google doesn't have any sort of special capabilities.
- antpls 8y agoToday's systems, such as planes or engines, are so complex that the only way to achieve today's level of efficiency is to use numerical simulations, aka Computer aided designs. Google excels at organizing information, processing big data and getting answers with predictive models, they do it better than anyone else and it can be potentially applied to just about any field.
- nradov 8y agoI haven't seen any evidence that Google is better at computational fluid dynamics than the large aerospace companies. This is just silly fanboyism with no basis in reality.