3 ms·
Back in the day, once I’d understood the value of decentralized revision control, I was convinced Mercurial would prevail, and that Git would become a footnote
by peatmoss 8y ago
Back in the day, once I’d understood the value of decentralized revision control, I was convinced Mercurial would prevail, and that Git would become a footnote in history.
This is one moment in my past that was formative in helping me make good tech predictions. Namely, if I see a technology that I think is better, and I think it will win out over an inferior technology, I simply reverse my prediction and enjoy being correct.
Coming from Subversion, Mercurial made so much more sense than Git. I still think the CLI is more consistent. I keep hoping for a new shakeup in revision control systems, though I suspect such a change will be a long time coming.
- skinnymuch 8y agoIsn’t a big part of Git overwhelmingly “winning” is Linus making it? The same sort of situation won’t be true in many other cases.
- lsh 8y agoNo, I don't think so. I think git "winning" was due to github.
- kasey_junk 8y agoSpecifically github made public repos free & private paid. Bitbucket did the opposite...