5 ms·

Isnt there a "Search this area" as you move the map to a different location?

Waterluvian 8y ago
Yup. If the app was map-centric you wouldn't have to ask. Just start showing more markers. If each query was a layer, you would also have a basic GIS. You could allow the user to start asking spatial questions, such as, "Show me where all the Chinese food restaurants (layer 1) Best Buys (layer 2) are. "Hmm. I need to go to Best Buy but I'm flexible about food. Let's tap X on the Chinese food layer and search for Poutine restaurants instead."
teraflop 8y ago
Yes, but it doesn't show up until after you've done a search, which means the damage may have already been done. Suppose you want to find things that match X near some landmark Y. As far as I know, you have two options. One is to search for the string "X near Y" and hope Google parses it correctly. The other is to search for Y, memorize its location on the map, search for X (which has a good chance of moving the map view to some random location), pan and zoom back to Y from memory, and click "search this area". It's a huge pain.
tetrep 8y ago
Critically, that option only appears after Maps hijacks your view to wherever it pleases. The same applies to other filters too, such as "open now." I'm stil amazed how hard Maps makes it to view a street name. I can fill my screen with a street and nothing else, and I still won't see its name. I feel like they actually do it on purpose to breed dependence on Maps for navigation references.
- nfoz 8y ago
  > I'm stil amazed how hard Maps makes it to view a street name. This is one of the reasons I prefer Apple Maps to Google's -- because IMO they do a slightly better job of that. Still wish it would be better, it's a daily nuisance for me.
- oeuviz 8y ago
  > I'm stil amazed how hard Maps makes it to view a street name. Even worse: rivers and streams
  - pkulak 8y ago
    Come on now, guys. Street and landmark names are the LAST things we need from a mapping application...

Yup. If the app was map-centric you wouldn't have to ask. Just start showing more markers. If each query was a layer, you would also have a basic GIS. You could allow the user to start asking spatial questions, such as, "Show me where all the Chinese food restaurants (layer 1) Best Buys (layer 2) are. "Hmm. I need to go to Best Buy but I'm flexible about food. Let's tap X on the Chinese food layer and search for Poutine restaurants instead."

teraflop 8y ago

Yes, but it doesn't show up until after you've done a search, which means the damage may have already been done. Suppose you want to find things that match X near some landmark Y. As far as I know, you have two options. One is to search for the string "X near Y" and hope Google parses it correctly. The other is to search for Y, memorize its location on the map, search for X (which has a good chance of moving the map view to some random location), pan and zoom back to Y from memory, and click "search this area". It's a huge pain.

tetrep 8y ago

Critically, that option only appears after Maps hijacks your view to wherever it pleases. The same applies to other filters too, such as "open now." I'm stil amazed how hard Maps makes it to view a street name. I can fill my screen with a street and nothing else, and I still won't see its name. I feel like they actually do it on purpose to breed dependence on Maps for navigation references.

nfoz 8y ago
> I'm stil amazed how hard Maps makes it to view a street name. This is one of the reasons I prefer Apple Maps to Google's -- because IMO they do a slightly better job of that. Still wish it would be better, it's a daily nuisance for me.
oeuviz 8y ago
> I'm stil amazed how hard Maps makes it to view a street name. Even worse: rivers and streams
- pkulak 8y ago
  Come on now, guys. Street and landmark names are the LAST things we need from a mapping application...