3 ms·
I've made my case that I think this guy is not worth the pay and trouble internally with the CEO; while he's not a key hire, I certainly am. And how did the CE
by michael_dorfman 16y ago
I've made my case that I think this guy is not worth the pay and trouble internally with the CEO; while he's not a key hire, I certainly am.
And how did the CEO respond? That's one of the missing pieces from the story-- an outside evaluation of the value of this guy. If he's as useless as you say, why is your co-founder so attached to keeping him? Could it be that he is providing some significant value to the company that you're not aware of?
If I were in your shoes, I'd modify your working list a bit, and go with 3B) Have a heart to heart with the CEO to find out what is really going on here. If that doesn't clear things up, I'd go to 2B) Make a case to the board, to try to get some motivation to find a better fit.
I wouldn't threaten to leave, or trash him to the board. Neither one is a productive move.
Your nemesis obviously has a high opinion of his skills and value. If that's the case, there should be some clear objectives and timeframes he's expected to hit. That should make these discussions a bit easier.
- HN_adv_seeker 16y agoThanks, this is helpful, and in the general direction I'm settling on. The heart-to-heart with the CEO was indeterminate. I am focusing on getting the guy's description aimed at biz-dev, an area that will be objectively measurable. If he's successful, we'll just have an overcompensated biz-dev guy on our hands, an improvement on the current situation. Regarding his value, I believe he's providing some emotional value to the CEO which is not material to the interests of the company. This is one of those 'soft-benefit' areas to my mind -- the CEO has gotta be happy, or things just won't work. On the other hand, there's gotta be a budget for CEO happiness, and I don't think we are in agreement about the appropriate size of that budget, or how much is being spent here.