4 ms·
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547260 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547260 9 years old
by glintik 8y ago
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547260 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547260
9 years old
- abrowne 8y agoPersonally I'd say 1000 no thanks if they implemented that. The scrollbars are part of the application chrome, not content. I should choose how to style them, through my OS, not a website I visit.
- pbhjpbhj 8y agoIt's actually 17y old, that bug or a dupe of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77790 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77790. Why do you want it - if you really need it then you can have a skin so the user can alter the user chrome to match a specific website. Personally I consider it one of IE5s many horrors that websites were given control over the users UI. (IIRC you could turn it off at least?)
- glintik 8y agoBugs are different, 77790 is about color, 547260 is about CSS styling(+size control). Default scrollbar width is very thick and its color is out of web developer control. It's a pain for developer to make a good admin panel with several scrollable areas. JS-scrolling is not stable for all browsers and CPU-intensive for mobiles.