4 ms·
DDB is serverless in the sense that you don't have to worry about scalability issues, but you have to worry about design issues[1] if you want to take advantage
by atmosx 8y ago
DDB is serverless in the sense that you don't have to worry about scalability issues, but you have to worry about design issues[1] if you want to take advantage of everything DynamoDB has to offer. I find dynamo's autoscaling very problematic: It's both slow to kick-in and you can scale down 4 times in 24h, not cost-effective if you have spikes.
[1]: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/best-practices.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerg...
- pragnesh 8y agonow aws allow to decrease throughput 27 times day. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/Limits.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerg...
- jonathan-kosgei 8y agoWe got DoS'd with a few hundred million calls over a few days and the dynamodb cost was about $4.