3 ms·
The literary critiques & reviews were hugely positive about Neuromancer, but its a fairly common take down of the book how bad the technology pieces are. Here
by kasey_junk 8y ago
The literary critiques & reviews were hugely positive about Neuromancer, but its a fairly common take down of the book how bad the technology pieces are.
Here is an interview with Gibson where he talks about it:
https://www.wired.com/2012/09/interview-with-william-gibson/ https://www.wired.com/2012/09/interview-with-william-gibson/
(For the record he talks about it in agreement, he thinks he himself could write a good takedown of the technology).
- jhayward 8y agoThanks for that interview link. Note that it was almost 30 years after publication. I suppose a critique of "not sufficiently prescient" is supported by it, but "known at the time of publication that it got the IT wrong", which is what I think the GP was saying, isn't.