9 ms·
I get your point. But my point is that I doubt a hedge fund would have been performing better than the 20% loss of the S&P. Maybe it would have incurred a 40% l
by yoran 8y ago
I get your point. But my point is that I doubt a hedge fund would have been performing better than the 20% loss of the S&P. Maybe it would have incurred a 40% loss. I think that in the investment world, action bias is very strong and literally doing nothing is not seen as a good thing.
We both agree that if you could have foreseen that decade, you would have sold all your stocks in 1998, put it on a savings account, and only have taken it out again in 2008.
- anoncoward111 8y agoI am glad we agree! I also 100% agree that the SAP500 may have performed better than plenty of funds 1998-2008. I'm sure we could even dig some up that did horribly. There were even funds 2008-2018 that liquidated during the Buffett bet :)