4 ms·
"If we don't do it, someone else will". There is probably no other argument more responsible for bringing us to the brink of nuclear holocaust than this one. Th
by stareatgoats 8y ago
"If we don't do it, someone else will". There is probably no other argument more responsible for bringing us to the brink of nuclear holocaust than this one. This is the argument that convinced the otherwise pacifist Einstein to write to president Roosevelt, urging for the Manhattan project.
So what's evil about it? Nothing by itself, it is self-evident that we can not allow our enemies be more powerful than us. But there is a second step, which has to follow: those powers have to be used for a universal good which go beyond our selfish identity interests. If not then we become the enemy ourselves.
I believe the reason that many are protesting against corporations handing over their technology to the military is because they feel this second step is missing. Right or wrong, they feel that the state has lost its moral compass.
- chii 8y agoBut wouldn't the correct response be to rectify the state/govt, rather than stop working on the tech? Just because some select group decides that it's their moral imperative, doesn't mean everyone capable of the research has the same feeling, and therefore, any Govt who wants to stay ahead of the pack must be doing the research.
- candiodari 8y agoThere's also the issue of it almost certainly being used against those governments that refuse to build it. So any decision not to proceed must consider that it's empowering everyone else.