3 ms·
That means nearly half have a single (or no) option. Further, for many who have two choices, the decision is between not-actually-very-Fast DSL or a single cabl
by dpark 8y ago
That means nearly half have a single (or no) option. Further, for many who have two choices, the decision is between not-actually-very-Fast DSL or a single cable provider.
In Mountain View I had only shitty DSL or shitty cable. Both sucked and cable was very expensive. (This may be different now. My experience was 8 or so years ago.)
I happen to be lucky to have actual high speed Comcast now, with an option for FTTH from Centurylink, plus DSL. Most people’s options are not so good.
- reaperducer 8y ago>for many who have two choices, the decision is between not-actually-very-Fast DSL or a single cable provider Very true. In one city where I have a house, the choice is 4 megabit DSL for $60/month, or 300 megabit cable for $101. Both are considered "broadband" by the FCC because the DSL is "up to" 8 megabits. But they are not equivalent services. There's also a wireless ISP, but it's $95/month for 5 megabits.
- adventured 8y agoThe FCC definition of broadband is 25mbps, not 8mbps. There was a proposal to roll that back, however it didn't succeed. You'll find that companies like Verizon do not call their slow DSL services "broadband." In Verizon's case they say: "High Speed Internet (DSL) service." https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/18/fcc-report-keeps-faster-definition-of-broadband-and-separates-mobile-from-fixed-connections/ https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/18/fcc-report-keeps-faster-de... If you look at Verizon's DSL page: https://www.verizon.com/info/dsl-services/ https://www.verizon.com/info/dsl-services/ You'll see they can't call their actual service broadband if it's not up at 25mbps. Instead they throw the "broadband" term around on other things on the page, such as "broadband routers" and they call themselves a "broadband provider" (referring to their FiOS offering).
- Fnoord 8y agoBroadband used to be symmetric (reference to e.g. T1 or E3). Now it is asymmetric. Without mentioning the upload speed, it can be anything.
- H1Supreme 8y agoMy two choices are Comcast or shitty DSL. And, the DSL isn't actually "competition" in any conceivable way. It's like saying that the gas station is competition to a super market for food.
- twothamendment 8y agoMy two choices are my rural-telepohone co-op - or satellite. I'm not complaining b/c my ISP seems fine, but there isn't anyone else to run to if I'm unhappy. I don't consider satellite an option. If we count satellite, doesn't everyone in the US have "access" to broadband?
- jachee 8y agoDepends. Does satellite do a minimum of 25mbps?
- amazon_not 8y agoYes. With the usual caveats.
- Fnoord 8y agoIe. terrible latency and terrible upload speed.