6 ms·

Being a generalist requires more sleep than specialists

79 points by ruang 16y ago

ruang 16y ago
The whole "tradeoff" series of this blog in general is really good for decision making. It includes: Some now vs More later Random vs Determined Proximity vs Scale Training vs Battling Loyalty vs Universality Sure Bet vs Shot in the Dark Switching Costs vs Change Gains Offense vs Defense *Efficiency vs Predicatability
- kiba 16y ago
  His blog is definitely a treasure trove of insights but I fear the principles that he confer in his blog will be lost to the sea of information that I digest daily. This is something that I am aware for some time now. I have no coherent modeling system and my knowledge are organized very ad hoc. Some economic insight here and there, stories, evidences, etc. It's not very systematic at all.
  - lionhearted 16y ago
    > I fear the principles that he confer in his blog will be lost to the sea of information that I digest daily. ... I have no coherent modeling system and my knowledge are organized very ad hoc. You might consider creating a file or note for every major project, campaign, or life goal you have. Then when you see something relevant to that, you copy/paste it in or make a note. There's ideas I've done that would have been totally gone if I didn't have loose thoughts sketched into a file on them. It takes a bit of work to set up, but it's actually surprisingly easy and natural to update throughout the day. Edit: I took a screenshot and uploaded it to Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebastmarsh/5028168457/lightbox http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebastmarsh/5028168457/lightbox - that file was built out and iterated over five months, so definitely start smaller and let things expand. Feel free to email me if do something like this and have any questions on getting set up.
    - allantyoung 16y ago
      I use Gmail to organize information that I encounter on the web. I email myself the link and the content/text. The great advantage of Gmail is that I can assign multiple Labels to each piece of email or content. Folder systems don't work as well for me because I would have to make multiple copies for something that was relevant to more than one major project.
      - kree10 16y ago
        Links + descriptions + tags = http://del.icio.us/ http://del.icio.us/ no?
    - sesqu 16y ago
      There's a plugin for Xfce4 called Notes that I use. It's hands-down the best such program I've used, so much so that it's a real barrier to switching away from Xfce. In the past, I've used text files on the desktop and e-mail drafts. This program (text only, no formatting/embeds/hyperlinks, does have named notes) sits on my top menu bar, and in one click opens up to fill half my screen. If I've used it today, it'll open up where I was last. Another click and it's gone, automatically saved. I don't know exactly how much I get out of it, but I definitely recommend some form of note-taking for everyone browsing the Internet.
    - matwood 16y ago
      I use a method similar to yours with a personal wiki and the free Evernote. I get lots of ideas while in the car or in bed and it's easy to jot it quickly down in Evernote and then transfer it to my wiki later.
    - louislouis 16y ago
      whats the software you used for this?
      - louislouis 16y ago
        sorry that was a dumb question, i figured it out now
  - mortenjorck 16y ago
    This is how I am. The way I see it, knowledge will always exist somewhere in your multidimensional conceptual space, so as long as you keep adding more with some degree of diversity, it will eventually start to form clouds, clusters, and networks. My sense is that the problem will tend to solve itself over time.
    - lionhearted 16y ago
      One of my close friends was a researcher in neuroscience and memory, and I'll tell you - this just simply isn't true for the majority of people. Lots of stuff you input is just lost if you don't make a note or copy it down. If you come across a really valuable obscure piece of information, you really ought to make a note of it, especially if you're not likely to come across it again.
      - Swizec 16y ago
        I've noticed this as well. However, once I note something down I might as well throw the piece of paper away. When I need the knowledge in a fuzzy way (obscure reference, seed of an idea etc.) it will just be there. If I need it specifically (like on an exam) noting it down or pretty much anything doesn't help, I have to study for the occasion and when I do my notes are too incomplete to be of help, I have to confer a more reliable source.
        DougBTX 16y ago
        > it will just be there. And if you don't remember it, you won't notice yourself being any worse off.
  - ruang 16y ago
    I use Microsoft OneNote to keep track of interesting things I read.
dochtman 16y ago
Title doesn't really reflect the contents of the article that well...
- felideon 16y ago
  You need to re-read the article, slowly. The title actually helped me understand the article.
dbingham 16y ago
I definitely fall into the generalist category. Just in working on my startup I have to write code in two different languages, write markup, do design (completely different from the code), do marketing/networking type stuff (further different from either the design or the coding) and enter recipes (which means reading and parsing them - further different). When not working on the startup I get bored if I don't get enough variety from my activities. If I'm doing too much liberal arts type work - such as when I teach, then I crave code. When I was coding all day at my day job, I got home and just wanted to read, cook or garden. I typically need 9 to 10 hours of sleep a night. I'll take more if I can get it. I can operate on 7 with lots of caffeine. Much less than that and I'm non-functional. My girlfriend, who only needs 6 hours of sleep a night (sometimes less), often gives me crap for being such a log. Especially when she wakes up a solid 2 hours before I do and spends the morning bored. But now I can give her a reason: I'm a generalist!
gjm11 16y ago
Interesting, but the article actually says hardly anything about sleep, and "generalists" here means "organisms with the ability to change in response to their environment". There's not the slightest suggestion that human beings who are more "generalist" need more sleep than ones who are "specialist" in any normal sense. Incidentally, sloths and armadillos sleep for about 20 hours a day. Are they generalists?
- city41 16y ago
  My cat must be the king of generality.
- DougBTX 16y ago
  Thanks. I found the article much more interesting than the title suggested.
- scott_s 16y ago
  If A -> B, it's not necessarily true that B -> A. (A = generalist, B = sleeps a lot.)
  - gjm11 16y ago
    On the other hand, if B is "sleeps more" (which was, after all, the claim in the subject line here) then A -> B and B -> A are pretty much the same thing, except that the meaning of B -> A is a little unclear.
    - scott_s 16y ago
      Not at all. There may be many things that can cause B ("sleeps more"), such as "hunts big game." So A -> B does not imply B -> A.
      - gjm11 16y ago
        Sorry, I wasn't clear. The point is that here B is "is a generalist rather than a specialist" and A is "sleeps more than a specialist". If the claim is "generalists sleep more than specialists" then any instance where a specialist sleeps more is a refutation of the claim if it's made in a very strong form (all generalists sleep more than all specialists) and evidence against the claim if it's made in a weaker form (generalists tend to sleep more than specialists). (It might in some cases be only very weak evidence. Indeed, I think it is only weak evidence here; armadillos and sloths are just two particular cases. So far as I know, though, there's no particular tendency for more-generalist animals to sleep longer.)
onefortwo 16y ago
While specialists count sheep to get sleep generalist try to build a framework for selling those sheep, so they have a lot more work to do while sleeping.

79 points by ruang 16y ago

ruang 16y ago

The whole "tradeoff" series of this blog in general is really good for decision making. It includes: Some now vs More later Random vs Determined Proximity vs Scale Training vs Battling Loyalty vs Universality Sure Bet vs Shot in the Dark Switching Costs vs Change Gains Offense vs Defense *Efficiency vs Predicatability

kiba 16y ago
His blog is definitely a treasure trove of insights but I fear the principles that he confer in his blog will be lost to the sea of information that I digest daily. This is something that I am aware for some time now. I have no coherent modeling system and my knowledge are organized very ad hoc. Some economic insight here and there, stories, evidences, etc. It's not very systematic at all.
- lionhearted 16y ago
  > I fear the principles that he confer in his blog will be lost to the sea of information that I digest daily. ... I have no coherent modeling system and my knowledge are organized very ad hoc. You might consider creating a file or note for every major project, campaign, or life goal you have. Then when you see something relevant to that, you copy/paste it in or make a note. There's ideas I've done that would have been totally gone if I didn't have loose thoughts sketched into a file on them. It takes a bit of work to set up, but it's actually surprisingly easy and natural to update throughout the day. Edit: I took a screenshot and uploaded it to Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebastmarsh/5028168457/lightbox http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebastmarsh/5028168457/lightbox - that file was built out and iterated over five months, so definitely start smaller and let things expand. Feel free to email me if do something like this and have any questions on getting set up.
  - allantyoung 16y ago
    I use Gmail to organize information that I encounter on the web. I email myself the link and the content/text. The great advantage of Gmail is that I can assign multiple Labels to each piece of email or content. Folder systems don't work as well for me because I would have to make multiple copies for something that was relevant to more than one major project.
    - kree10 16y ago
      Links + descriptions + tags = http://del.icio.us/ http://del.icio.us/ no?
  - sesqu 16y ago
    There's a plugin for Xfce4 called Notes that I use. It's hands-down the best such program I've used, so much so that it's a real barrier to switching away from Xfce. In the past, I've used text files on the desktop and e-mail drafts. This program (text only, no formatting/embeds/hyperlinks, does have named notes) sits on my top menu bar, and in one click opens up to fill half my screen. If I've used it today, it'll open up where I was last. Another click and it's gone, automatically saved. I don't know exactly how much I get out of it, but I definitely recommend some form of note-taking for everyone browsing the Internet.
  - matwood 16y ago
    I use a method similar to yours with a personal wiki and the free Evernote. I get lots of ideas while in the car or in bed and it's easy to jot it quickly down in Evernote and then transfer it to my wiki later.
  - louislouis 16y ago
    whats the software you used for this?
    - louislouis 16y ago
      sorry that was a dumb question, i figured it out now
- mortenjorck 16y ago
  This is how I am. The way I see it, knowledge will always exist somewhere in your multidimensional conceptual space, so as long as you keep adding more with some degree of diversity, it will eventually start to form clouds, clusters, and networks. My sense is that the problem will tend to solve itself over time.
  - lionhearted 16y ago
    One of my close friends was a researcher in neuroscience and memory, and I'll tell you - this just simply isn't true for the majority of people. Lots of stuff you input is just lost if you don't make a note or copy it down. If you come across a really valuable obscure piece of information, you really ought to make a note of it, especially if you're not likely to come across it again.
    - Swizec 16y ago
      I've noticed this as well. However, once I note something down I might as well throw the piece of paper away. When I need the knowledge in a fuzzy way (obscure reference, seed of an idea etc.) it will just be there. If I need it specifically (like on an exam) noting it down or pretty much anything doesn't help, I have to study for the occasion and when I do my notes are too incomplete to be of help, I have to confer a more reliable source.
      - DougBTX 16y ago
        > it will just be there. And if you don't remember it, you won't notice yourself being any worse off.
- ruang 16y ago
  I use Microsoft OneNote to keep track of interesting things I read.

dochtman 16y ago

Title doesn't really reflect the contents of the article that well...

felideon 16y ago
You need to re-read the article, slowly. The title actually helped me understand the article.

dbingham 16y ago

I definitely fall into the generalist category. Just in working on my startup I have to write code in two different languages, write markup, do design (completely different from the code), do marketing/networking type stuff (further different from either the design or the coding) and enter recipes (which means reading and parsing them - further different). When not working on the startup I get bored if I don't get enough variety from my activities. If I'm doing too much liberal arts type work - such as when I teach, then I crave code. When I was coding all day at my day job, I got home and just wanted to read, cook or garden. I typically need 9 to 10 hours of sleep a night. I'll take more if I can get it. I can operate on 7 with lots of caffeine. Much less than that and I'm non-functional. My girlfriend, who only needs 6 hours of sleep a night (sometimes less), often gives me crap for being such a log. Especially when she wakes up a solid 2 hours before I do and spends the morning bored. But now I can give her a reason: I'm a generalist!

gjm11 16y ago

Interesting, but the article actually says hardly anything about sleep, and "generalists" here means "organisms with the ability to change in response to their environment". There's not the slightest suggestion that human beings who are more "generalist" need more sleep than ones who are "specialist" in any normal sense. Incidentally, sloths and armadillos sleep for about 20 hours a day. Are they generalists?

city41 16y ago
My cat must be the king of generality.
DougBTX 16y ago
Thanks. I found the article much more interesting than the title suggested.
scott_s 16y ago
If A -> B, it's not necessarily true that B -> A. (A = generalist, B = sleeps a lot.)
- gjm11 16y ago
  On the other hand, if B is "sleeps more" (which was, after all, the claim in the subject line here) then A -> B and B -> A are pretty much the same thing, except that the meaning of B -> A is a little unclear.
  - scott_s 16y ago
    Not at all. There may be many things that can cause B ("sleeps more"), such as "hunts big game." So A -> B does not imply B -> A.
    - gjm11 16y ago
      Sorry, I wasn't clear. The point is that here B is "is a generalist rather than a specialist" and A is "sleeps more than a specialist". If the claim is "generalists sleep more than specialists" then any instance where a specialist sleeps more is a refutation of the claim if it's made in a very strong form (all generalists sleep more than all specialists) and evidence against the claim if it's made in a weaker form (generalists tend to sleep more than specialists). (It might in some cases be only very weak evidence. Indeed, I think it is only weak evidence here; armadillos and sloths are just two particular cases. So far as I know, though, there's no particular tendency for more-generalist animals to sleep longer.)

onefortwo 16y ago

While specialists count sheep to get sleep generalist try to build a framework for selling those sheep, so they have a lot more work to do while sleeping.