3 ms·
I meant that the internal state of like/hate would be a response to something that the laptop experienced. >Please be more clear, as the topic demands it. You
by ppod 8y ago
I meant that the internal state of like/hate would be a response to something that the laptop experienced.
>Please be more clear, as the topic demands it.
You are using terms like 'pleasure' and 'experience' that have no scientific definition. I find your entire line of thinking unclear, but it doesn't help the tone of the argument to demand clarity.
>Anyway, how do I create a laptop that finds pleasure in its work? Do I throw away the ones that don't work, and keep the ones that work? Is that enough selection?
As with dogs, the internal state of the laptop would need to be malleable per generation, with generations of reproduction under adaptive pressures that favour the human owner. We currently don't have laptops of this kind.
- amelius 8y ago> You are using terms like 'pleasure' and 'experience' that have no scientific definition. We are not in the domain of science, but in the domain of philosophy ... Also, don't you understand what I mean by "pleasure" or "experience"? Are you a bot? :) > As with dogs, the internal state of the laptop would need to be malleable per generation, with generations of reproduction under adaptive pressures that favour the human owner. We currently don't have laptops of this kind. We have genetic algorithms, so I'm sure we could come up with such laptops.
- asfasgasg 8y ago> We have genetic algorithms, so I'm sure we could come up with such laptops. It is almost certain that we someday will. I doubt I'll still be alive to see it, though.