3 ms·
I will be sure to immediately replace my bag of chips with a bag of onions? Poor people are likely to be both cash-poor and time-poor: it's not a question of "
by learnstats2 8y ago
I will be sure to immediately replace my bag of chips with a bag of onions?
Poor people are likely to be both cash-poor and time-poor: it's not a question of "being bothered". If you have the available time to fully consider, process, and follow this advice, then you may not realistically be poor at all.
And, if you did manage to follow this advice, you would likely still be poor - saving pennies on food is not any way out of poverty.
- matwood 8y agoI was poor growing up. Both parents worked, a lot. My mom had tons of ways to quickly prepare ground beef or chicken into something that tasted good. When she had time she bought whole chickens and broken them down because it was cheaper. Maybe once/month she would buy a 2 liter of soda as a treat for my sister and me. So I've been there and done that. And lets get off of this no time argument. Why do all these people with no time still have TVs? The average American watches ~5 hours of TV per day. Watch 4 hours instead and cook a healthier and cheaper meal.
- s73v3r_ 8y ago"And lets get off of this no time argument. Why do all these people with no time still have TVs? The average American watches ~5 hours of TV per day. Watch 4 hours instead and cook a healthier and cheaper meal." That's a complete non-sequitor. You're going to have to provide evidence that those who are poor are the ones watching tv so much, and don't have the time because they're working multiple jobs.