4 ms·
This: > 0. You just DO WHAT THE F*CK YOU WANT TO as long as you NEVER LEAVE A TRACE TO TRACK THE AUTHOR of the original product. may be in fact quite tricky t
by tener 8y ago
This:
> 0. You just DO WHAT THE F*CK YOU WANT TO as long as you NEVER LEAVE A
TRACE TO TRACK THE AUTHOR of the original product.
may be in fact quite tricky to ensure: unless you do an (potentially expensive) audit of the code and all potential binary assets within you will never be sure.
To see how difficult it is to erase all traces: see how the state-backed hacking groups keep getting traced.
EDIT:
Why the downvotes? Yeah I know this is a joke license, but to a lawyer no license is a joke, and to use something in a corporate environment you really need to have one on board.
- evilduck 8y agoSo if you want to use the GLWT license, good luck with that?
- imtringued 8y ago"Copyright (c) [year] [fullname]" I don't think it's possible to comply with this license because the license text itself will already contain enough information to track the author.
- lucb1e 8y agoNobody said you had to leave it in there. In fact, it explicitly states you have to get it out of there.
- Someone1234 8y agoMaybe the license needs a license so we know how we're allowed to use it.
- bunderbunder 8y ago> Yeah I know this is a joke license, but to a lawyer no license is a joke, and to use something in a corporate environment you really need to have one on board. For the kind of projects this license is ostensibly meant for, I think that it's most resonable to regard "no sensible lawyer would ever OK this" as a feature rather than a bug.