As an example of what can go wrong with two tier voting stock, look at the conflict between CBS and Viacom. I don't agree that a founder should have a greater

As an example of what can go wrong with two tier voting stock, look at the conflict between CBS and Viacom. I don't agree that a founder should have a greater voting share than his or her ownership. I know that has got to be a really unpopular view here. But even if you don't agree with me, how long is that voting ratio supposed to last? Can it continue after you break up the company into pieces? Should it apply to ancestors of the founder?