5 ms·

That Emptiness has been apparent event since the 2nd film, and is simply continued by Disney. Disney is milking a dead cow, to the delight of the Star Wars fans

That Emptiness has been apparent event since the 2nd film, and is simply continued by Disney. Disney is milking a dead cow, to the delight of the Star Wars fans who have been sucked into this drivel for nearly 40 years. It's a fucking space cowboy western with Buck Rogers quality sets, acting, and direction. Beyond the metaphors lost from the original film, Star Wars has been decades of childish marketing and quality story line missed opportunity disappointments.

whywhywhywhy 8y ago
It's not just milking, it seems they have actual contempt for the existing fan base to the franchise and trying to dismantle the foundation piece by piece in the worst way possible while simultaneously trying to build their own thing on top. I'm not a Star Wars fan (Episode 1 killed it for me), but watching this from the sideline has been nothing short of bizarre to me.
- Retra 8y ago
  The existing fan base isn't the 6-10 years old toy-demanding target audience. In 15 years, those people will be spending their money trying to participate in the nostalgia being engineered today and the existing fan base will be largely irrelevant.
  - baud147258 8y ago
    But then why are they making origin stories that would only interest existing fans?
    - dspillett 8y ago
      So they can hook new fans with the origin stories, then sell them copies of the previous instalments without having to create anything new except a fresh box design so the collectionists amongst the older fans will buy them again too?
    - Jtsummers 8y ago
      Contemporary nerd culture. It's all about being in on things, so you have 20 year olds that act like old fans of ST:TOS when they were -30 years old when it first aired, and was the last of the series that they ever watched (they may not have even watched it). They know everything about it, titles, air dates, actors who played bit parts and became famous later. Or people who didn't give a shit about Spiderman in the 90s who're fully read up on his wikia content now. This leads to a faux or ironic nostalgia act by everyone involved: the "fans", the actual fans, the creators, and the media around it all. It's making things pretty dull because this spans all ages. Older folks may have actually been fans from the start, but they still fall for teh nostalgia trip of the new media and spend money on it. And the media companies make things that are designed to appeal. To nod and wink at you for being so clever, for knowing which episode or comic issue that quote came from. For knowing that this guy was a villian in the comics, but here we'll give him to you as a bit part. Wink wink.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
sizzzzlerz 8y ago
Star Wars sequels have been nothing more that a vehicle to market toys and other movie-related things to the next generation of children. They carefully craft each film to have at least one character that a marketing plan can be built around. It's sort of like the hook musicians try to place in their songs. That said, Disney will continue to churn these things out so long as ticket sales are high and their merchandise sells.
- zrail 8y ago
  This has been true since the very first film. Lucas kept the merchandising rights for a very good reason.
  - Isamu 8y ago
    He lucked out there. He retained merchandising because it was considered worthless. Star Wars set the pattern for this kind of film-plus-merchandising blockbuster. Although there was no advance merch when Star Wars came out, this quickly changed when the toy manufacturing partners realized they had a real gravy train.
Hasknewbie 8y ago
> It's a fucking space cowboy western I agree with Red Letter Media's take on this: SW is fundamentally a small universe (yes the universe IN SW is vast, but the universe OF SW is not: it's just rebels+jedis fighting stormtroopers+darth-lords. The only attempt at expanding the universe, the prequels, was a disaster). With that in mind, it's not surprising the movies are so unimaginative and Disney keep repeating themselves.
- glenra 8y ago
  > SW is fundamentally a small universe My favorite example from the new Solo film: Solo is told something like "find me later on Tatooine". Imagine somebody saying "If we get out this, see me later - I'll be on earth." Or, even "I'll in New York." Does Tatooine have more than one city? More than one bar? Is there a phone directory for finding people there?
noxToken 8y ago
The article dances around and slightly touches this, but for me, it was always the mythos and size of the universe. The movies were never the big draw for me. The novels held the true universe. Legends was massive. The feats within Legends were sometimes outlandish, so it makes sense that it was all scrapped. The Plagueis meme was a throwaway line in a prequal movie. Luceno wrote the novel roughly 7 years later, and it is one of my favorite SW novels to date. It perfectly encapsulates the feeling of the Rule of Two, the Sith moving in the shadows to subvert an entire collective of governments, and the true power of patience. Current canon isn't giving the universe enough room to breathe. They want to fill in every last detail on the timeline with no room for secondary or tertiary characters to have their own plot in the background. Plagueis was Sidious' master, but Luceno did not nor needed to fill in every last detail of Sidious' apprenticeship. We get some details of a young Palpatine, but the novel doesn't crash headfirst into the Phantom Menace. TL;DR: Star Wars shined, because it always left room for interpretation and exploration - even in fleshed out novels.
- bsenftner 8y ago
  Need to drop using the term "canon", as it implies quality literature, which this drivel is not in the slightest.
krapp 8y ago
>It's a fucking space cowboy western with Buck Rogers quality sets, acting, and direction. The acting and direction I'll grant you, and yes, it's supposed to be a space cowboy western, but I don't think anyone would describe the sets or visual design of Star Wars as "Buck Rogers quality," if that's supposed to mean shoddy or inexpensive. The one thing Star Wars gets consistently right in my opinion (even with the prequels, which I despise otherwise) is that it always looks good.
- bsenftner 8y ago
  That right there is one of the major failures of the franchise: in the first film their world is filled with rusted, half operating, jury rigged everything. The Empire was the only organization with enough wealth to afford new technology, and everyone else was poverty stricken and making due. That is beautiful realism. Every single film since the first has has a "shiny chrome" world - like a fucking dumb Buck Rodgers concept.
Balgair 8y ago
You should really watch Clone Wars then, it's considered canon and is really good in general. If you don't want to watch all 121 of them, these are the best: 5. Carnage of Krell (Season 4) 4. Orders (Season 6) 3. ARC Troopers (Season 3) 2. The Lawless (Season 5) 1. The Wrong Jedi (Season 5)
- bsenftner 8y ago
  Why? Indoctrinate myself to the drivel?
  - Balgair 8y ago
    Dude, I'm saying that it's not drivel, it's good. Don't knock it before you try it. Also, indoctrinate??? What are you on about?
    - bsenftner 8y ago
      Sorry. I'd had two over enthusiastic fans knocking my non-fandom the day I wrote that.
mrighele 8y ago
There is nothing wrong with a space cowboy western, and in fact that's one of the reason people love the original trilogy: plenty of original (for the time) action, good guys on one side and BIG BAD guys on the other, so it is easy to takes sides, add some cheap mysticism (the "force" stuff) and the redemption of the baddest of the bad guys. Not the most original of the plots [1], but good enough and simple enough that most people can enjoy it. That's not the issue with the current state of Star Wars in my opinion. Also for most people Star Wars is the movies so the issue about what is canon and whats is not is moot [2]: for them it is canon if it appears in one of the trilogies. I have three other different issues with the current trilogy (and in general Disney's approach to Star Wars). The first is that the current trilogy is just more of the same. The Force Awakens to me looks more like a reboot of the original movie than a sequel. The Last Jedi is a bit better but only because it looks a reboot of the whole original trilogy: I think that a better name would have been "The Empire strikes the return of the last jedi", and that would even describe the most relevant parts of the movie perfectly. In a way the prequel trilogy is better: while it is not up to par with the original trilogy, I like the contrast between a world where Jedis are available by the dozen (for example see when the jedis come to save the main characters in the arena) versus a world where there are two "bad" force users (Darth Vader and the Emperor) and two "good" force users (Luke and, for a while, Ben Kenobi). The second issue is more general, and it is related to the fact that regardless of the quality of the content, the more movies you make about a topic or a "universe" the less value the single movie has. Even worse, after a given threshold I won't even watch any movie about the genre because I fear that if I don't see all of them I will miss something. I feel that way about the gazillion of Marvel/DC Comics movies, I feel the same about Star Trek (I only know about the original serie, but I don't have time to see _all_ the episode that I missed) and I fear one day I will feel the same about Star Wars. [1] Also it seems Star Wars got many idea from other movies. My favorite is the one about getting inspiration for R2D2 and C3PO from the main characters of Kurosawa's "the hidden fortress", though after seeing the movies I would say the resemblance is only in "the character of the characters" [2] I have to admit that I played to some of the games, and I think that KOTOR has a story that is much better that Star Wars original story. THAT is something I would love to see a movie about.

whywhywhywhy 8y ago

It's not just milking, it seems they have actual contempt for the existing fan base to the franchise and trying to dismantle the foundation piece by piece in the worst way possible while simultaneously trying to build their own thing on top. I'm not a Star Wars fan (Episode 1 killed it for me), but watching this from the sideline has been nothing short of bizarre to me.

Retra 8y ago
The existing fan base isn't the 6-10 years old toy-demanding target audience. In 15 years, those people will be spending their money trying to participate in the nostalgia being engineered today and the existing fan base will be largely irrelevant.
- baud147258 8y ago
  But then why are they making origin stories that would only interest existing fans?
  - dspillett 8y ago
    So they can hook new fans with the origin stories, then sell them copies of the previous instalments without having to create anything new except a fresh box design so the collectionists amongst the older fans will buy them again too?
  - Jtsummers 8y ago
    Contemporary nerd culture. It's all about being in on things, so you have 20 year olds that act like old fans of ST:TOS when they were -30 years old when it first aired, and was the last of the series that they ever watched (they may not have even watched it). They know everything about it, titles, air dates, actors who played bit parts and became famous later. Or people who didn't give a shit about Spiderman in the 90s who're fully read up on his wikia content now. This leads to a faux or ironic nostalgia act by everyone involved: the "fans", the actual fans, the creators, and the media around it all. It's making things pretty dull because this spans all ages. Older folks may have actually been fans from the start, but they still fall for teh nostalgia trip of the new media and spend money on it. And the media companies make things that are designed to appeal. To nod and wink at you for being so clever, for knowing which episode or comic issue that quote came from. For knowing that this guy was a villian in the comics, but here we'll give him to you as a bit part. Wink wink.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

sizzzzlerz 8y ago

Star Wars sequels have been nothing more that a vehicle to market toys and other movie-related things to the next generation of children. They carefully craft each film to have at least one character that a marketing plan can be built around. It's sort of like the hook musicians try to place in their songs. That said, Disney will continue to churn these things out so long as ticket sales are high and their merchandise sells.

zrail 8y ago
This has been true since the very first film. Lucas kept the merchandising rights for a very good reason.
- Isamu 8y ago
  He lucked out there. He retained merchandising because it was considered worthless. Star Wars set the pattern for this kind of film-plus-merchandising blockbuster. Although there was no advance merch when Star Wars came out, this quickly changed when the toy manufacturing partners realized they had a real gravy train.

Hasknewbie 8y ago

> It's a fucking space cowboy western I agree with Red Letter Media's take on this: SW is fundamentally a small universe (yes the universe IN SW is vast, but the universe OF SW is not: it's just rebels+jedis fighting stormtroopers+darth-lords. The only attempt at expanding the universe, the prequels, was a disaster). With that in mind, it's not surprising the movies are so unimaginative and Disney keep repeating themselves.

glenra 8y ago
> SW is fundamentally a small universe My favorite example from the new Solo film: Solo is told something like "find me later on Tatooine". Imagine somebody saying "If we get out this, see me later - I'll be on earth." Or, even "I'll in New York." Does Tatooine have more than one city? More than one bar? Is there a phone directory for finding people there?

noxToken 8y ago

The article dances around and slightly touches this, but for me, it was always the mythos and size of the universe. The movies were never the big draw for me. The novels held the true universe. Legends was massive. The feats within Legends were sometimes outlandish, so it makes sense that it was all scrapped. The Plagueis meme was a throwaway line in a prequal movie. Luceno wrote the novel roughly 7 years later, and it is one of my favorite SW novels to date. It perfectly encapsulates the feeling of the Rule of Two, the Sith moving in the shadows to subvert an entire collective of governments, and the true power of patience. Current canon isn't giving the universe enough room to breathe. They want to fill in every last detail on the timeline with no room for secondary or tertiary characters to have their own plot in the background. Plagueis was Sidious' master, but Luceno did not nor needed to fill in every last detail of Sidious' apprenticeship. We get some details of a young Palpatine, but the novel doesn't crash headfirst into the Phantom Menace. TL;DR: Star Wars shined, because it always left room for interpretation and exploration - even in fleshed out novels.

bsenftner 8y ago
Need to drop using the term "canon", as it implies quality literature, which this drivel is not in the slightest.

krapp 8y ago

>It's a fucking space cowboy western with Buck Rogers quality sets, acting, and direction. The acting and direction I'll grant you, and yes, it's supposed to be a space cowboy western, but I don't think anyone would describe the sets or visual design of Star Wars as "Buck Rogers quality," if that's supposed to mean shoddy or inexpensive. The one thing Star Wars gets consistently right in my opinion (even with the prequels, which I despise otherwise) is that it always looks good.

bsenftner 8y ago
That right there is one of the major failures of the franchise: in the first film their world is filled with rusted, half operating, jury rigged everything. The Empire was the only organization with enough wealth to afford new technology, and everyone else was poverty stricken and making due. That is beautiful realism. Every single film since the first has has a "shiny chrome" world - like a fucking dumb Buck Rodgers concept.

Balgair 8y ago

You should really watch Clone Wars then, it's considered canon and is really good in general. If you don't want to watch all 121 of them, these are the best: 5. Carnage of Krell (Season 4) 4. Orders (Season 6) 3. ARC Troopers (Season 3) 2. The Lawless (Season 5) 1. The Wrong Jedi (Season 5)

bsenftner 8y ago
Why? Indoctrinate myself to the drivel?
- Balgair 8y ago
  Dude, I'm saying that it's not drivel, it's good. Don't knock it before you try it. Also, indoctrinate??? What are you on about?
  - bsenftner 8y ago
    Sorry. I'd had two over enthusiastic fans knocking my non-fandom the day I wrote that.

mrighele 8y ago

There is nothing wrong with a space cowboy western, and in fact that's one of the reason people love the original trilogy: plenty of original (for the time) action, good guys on one side and BIG BAD guys on the other, so it is easy to takes sides, add some cheap mysticism (the "force" stuff) and the redemption of the baddest of the bad guys. Not the most original of the plots [1], but good enough and simple enough that most people can enjoy it. That's not the issue with the current state of Star Wars in my opinion. Also for most people Star Wars is the movies so the issue about what is canon and whats is not is moot [2]: for them it is canon if it appears in one of the trilogies. I have three other different issues with the current trilogy (and in general Disney's approach to Star Wars). The first is that the current trilogy is just more of the same. The Force Awakens to me looks more like a reboot of the original movie than a sequel. The Last Jedi is a bit better but only because it looks a reboot of the whole original trilogy: I think that a better name would have been "The Empire strikes the return of the last jedi", and that would even describe the most relevant parts of the movie perfectly. In a way the prequel trilogy is better: while it is not up to par with the original trilogy, I like the contrast between a world where Jedis are available by the dozen (for example see when the jedis come to save the main characters in the arena) versus a world where there are two "bad" force users (Darth Vader and the Emperor) and two "good" force users (Luke and, for a while, Ben Kenobi). The second issue is more general, and it is related to the fact that regardless of the quality of the content, the more movies you make about a topic or a "universe" the less value the single movie has. Even worse, after a given threshold I won't even watch any movie about the genre because I fear that if I don't see all of them I will miss something. I feel that way about the gazillion of Marvel/DC Comics movies, I feel the same about Star Trek (I only know about the original serie, but I don't have time to see _all_ the episode that I missed) and I fear one day I will feel the same about Star Wars. [1] Also it seems Star Wars got many idea from other movies. My favorite is the one about getting inspiration for R2D2 and C3PO from the main characters of Kurosawa's "the hidden fortress", though after seeing the movies I would say the resemblance is only in "the character of the characters" [2] I have to admit that I played to some of the games, and I think that KOTOR has a story that is much better that Star Wars original story. THAT is something I would love to see a movie about.