5 ms·
Yep, time zones are lame and we’d be much better off if everyone just got used to saying the time in UTC. But then an “9 to 5” would become a “regular 8-hour sh
by seanp2k2 8y ago
Yep, time zones are lame and we’d be much better off if everyone just got used to saying the time in UTC. But then an “9 to 5” would become a “regular 8-hour shift” and be less fun to talk about, school might let out at 0300, and the times would vary when it’s dark / light out, which would probably be too much for the average joe to handle.
- rspeele 8y agoAlso depending where you live, it might become the next calendar day in mid-afternoon. Imagine: "Want to meet up Friday?" ... "You mean tomorrow afternoon, or the morning after that?"
- eXpl0it3r 8y agoEveryone on UTC is really just useful for scheduling stuff internationally and just because of that, telling everyone to change their daily life, so you have it a bit easier, doesn't seem like the right plan. Additionally, timezones aren't really the big issue, it's more the changing of timezones due to DST or similar is what's causing the biggest issue. Getting rid of DST looks like a lot better solution for everyone.
- petre 8y agoThe worst thing about DST is that it breaks the linearity of time, allowing for it to skip back and forth and causing all sorts of problems such as "missing" and "empty" hours. In my country the train stops for one hour at the spring DST change and just waits for time to pass to account for the "missing" hour and not mess up the schedules by arriving one hour earlier.
- rkuykendall-com 8y agoEh, people would keep saying 9-to-5 and post in Future-Reddit "TIL 9-to-5 jobs are called that because in the early 21st century 9am was defined as when the work-day started" or something else equally half-right.
- caf 8y agoThen someone else would reply that it was actually because Government workers traditionally finished their work day at 4:51pm.