5 ms·

Like I said the last time this subject came up, fine. That's totally fine. I don't care which incumbents will be okay in a world with better laws around priva

• wyldfire 8y ago
  > If your startup to unseat Salesforce requires doing tricky or infelicitous shit with my personal data, I don't want you to be able to operate, full stop. Yeah, I'm onboard (like I said, I think the intent of the law is good) -- but regulatory compliance is expensive and in general creating a SaaS business is not. Compliance is more than just doing the right thing, BTW, it's creating processes, audits, attorneys, etc to prove that you're doing the right thing. One of SFDC's risks is that today a competitor could probably arrive and eat up their business by emulating their business model and undercutting their costs. They're very well placed to establish or enhance their existing regulatory compliance team(s).
  • Kalium 8y ago
    There's a tendency to think of well-intentioned regulations that serve whatever purpose someone wishes to advance as cheaply and easily complied with by an honest actor. This tends to not be maximally congruent with reality.
• Mahn 8y ago
  What if my startup does not require tricky or infelicitous shit with your personal data, but due to strict regulation I now require to hire a full time lawyer just to redact the company terms and keep up with regulations, and since my company does not yet make any revenue and I have no investors that means a lot more risk on my side, which in turns leads me to not start or not go on with that company at all? And what if this decrease in garage startups leads to less competition and more concentration of power for the big companies, which then can happily lobby and influence laws to their own interests with no one to contest them? Is that the deal that we want in exchange for mildly inconveniencing Facebook and Google?
  • dbasedweeb 8y ago
    Is it really so hard to believe that people are all out of trust and goodwill at this point? It’s like having a classroom full of toddlers who all play with matches, and every few weeks they burn the whole school down. Finally the teachers makes rule: no one gets to play with matches. A couple of kids say they’re very responsible and never set fire to anything. Nobody cares.
    • jimmaswell 8y ago
      I could say the same thing in reverse about regulations. Every few weeks some regulation ruins the internet even more and finally people are sick of the regulations. Name one way your life was ever negatively impacted, in a concrete way and not just in your head, by companies using your data to create value in the form of targeted ads and such to keep websites free. I'm waiting.
      • jakelazaroff 8y ago
        Equifax breach and stolen identities? Cambridge Analytica and the 2016 US Presidential election? Ashley Madison and affairs being revealed? We can go back and forth about the best way to deal with this, but it's crazy to think that this systemic gobbling up of personal data doesn't have real consequences.
        • jimmaswell 8y ago
          I don't see it as fair to say those are consequences of the companies being allowed to have the data in the first place. They're consequences of poor security. We don't blame spam on email or food poisoning on food, do we? A GDPR-like approach to solving spam would be outlawing all automated or business-related use of email.
      • Dylan16807 8y ago
        I suppose you don't count strangers having my personal data as "concrete"? But I can't think of any internet regulation that's ever harmed me. Which ones are you talking about? Edit: I can think of a small number of regulations (much less than one per year) that cause problems, but they still don't meet the personal concrete harm threshold you've proposed.