5 ms·
When I saw the Google demo of a CNN using video to split a single audio stream of two guys talking over each other, I became a believer.
by wrycoder 8y ago
When I saw the Google demo of a CNN using video to split a single audio stream of two guys talking over each other, I became a believer.
- fratlas 8y agoDo you have a video of this?
- jvolkman 8y agohttps://youtu.be/ogfYd705cRs?t=6m54s https://youtu.be/ogfYd705cRs?t=6m54s Edit: also, a blog post with more examples and a link to the related publication: https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/04/looking-to-listen-audio-visual-speech.html https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/04/looking-to-listen-audio-vi...
- signa11 8y agois it this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnzlbyTZsQY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnzlbyTZsQY perhaps ?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- wrycoder 8y agoSorry, I went to bed! The original google report was discussed here a few weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16813766 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16813766
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- felippee 8y agoHey, a small advice for the future: never build your belief entirely on a youtube video of a demo. In fact, never build your belief based on a demo, period. This is notorious with current technology: you can demonstrate anything. A few years ago Tesla demonstrated a driverless car. And what? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. I'm willing to believe stuff I can test myself at home. If it works there, it likely actually works (though possibly needs more testing). But demo booths and youtube - never.
- paul_milovanov 8y agoYour advice would be a lot more convincing if you had a youtube video of a demo to come with it. Just saying. :P
- tensor 8y agoYou can't test most of high end physics at home. I hope that doesn't mean you don't believe it!
- Ngunyan 8y agoWe're talking here of technology, something that can be turned into a product, and not black holes, for example.
- shub 8y agoA lab publishes an exciting result, what does the physics community do? Wait for replication. Or if you’re LHC, be very careful what you publish.
- sanxiyn 8y agoIn theory, there are two separate experiments (ATLAS and CMS) on LHC because of this. In practice, they are probably not independent enough.
- oldgradstudent 8y agoIt's probably a good idea to ignore high-end physics results for a few years, though. The BICEP2 fiasco is a good example why.
- sgt101 8y agoA rigorous evaluation with particular focus on where it doesn't work would be better.