4 ms·
Funny how Americans get so shocked about it, while it is quite clear to the rest of the world. Honestly when I was visiting the US the first time, I was shocked
by erikb 8y ago
Funny how Americans get so shocked about it, while it is quite clear to the rest of the world. Honestly when I was visiting the US the first time, I was shocked how Second World everything was. Most people live in poor areas (of course most well off Americans don't travel to these part of towns so they don't see it). Many non-chain shops are struggling. Food prices are ridiculously high in comparison to the not that much higher pay Americans receive for the same job. Even the electricity system looks somewhat like Vietnam or India.
- llcoolv 8y agoStill million times better than a socialist republic. And no, "Oh, but if you're really good at ass licking, you could beg the government to give you some of your own money back and some are even using it as scam to live off others." doesn't change my mind.
- llcoolv 8y agoGreat. A whole bunch of downvotes and not a single decent argument :D
- tjr225 8y agoThe level of discourse you're pursuing isn't tolerated on HN. It should come as no surprise to you that no one is engaging with you- that is, of course unless you're being serious...in which case I feel dreadfully sorry for you.
- musage 8y agoSaying that anyone and everyone who needs welfare is just lazy is so disgusting considering the wide ranges of hardships and diseases that can befall people, I would absolutely punch you in the mouth for it. Fuck clicking a button on a website.
- adventured 8y agoThat's false. France has a higher cost of living and higher food prices [1], with a considerably lower overall median and full-time median income level, versus the US. US GDP per capita is also currently 50% higher than France. France has an unemployment rate ~120% higher than in the US. US wage growth has been roughly 8x to 10x that of France over the last 20 years (France only averaged 0.5% annual wage growth over that time). So let's recap. France has: far lower median wages, far lower wage growth, a higher poverty rate, a higher homelessness rate, dramatically lower GDP per capita, and an economy that hasn't net expanded in over a decade. In 1980 France had a higher GDP per capita than the US. In 1990 France was just barely behind the US on GDP per capita. Today it's about $40,000 vs $60,000; that gap is persistently widening, with France falling down the global economic ladder by the year. It also explains why wage growth has been so extremely low in France over that time. [1] https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.jsp https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.js...
- imdutch 8y agoPlease mind the difference exchange rates make, otherwise comparisons over time are meaningless. France it's GDP per capita was not higher in 1980, the relative gap was similar to today. Furthermore, median wage growth has done much better there than in the US over that period. Also poverty rates are set by national standards not international, they're hard to compare unless when it's between EU members for example. https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/5668ba742340f8b1008b48fd-750-476.png https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/5668ba742340f8b1008b4...
- llcoolv 8y agoIf you wonder why your comment got downvoted, let me come with a quick answer. "The level of discourse you're pursuing isn't tolerated on HN. It should come as no surprise to you that no one is engaging with you- that is, of course unless you're being serious...in which case I feel dreadfully sorry for you." :D :D :D But don't worry. This weekend I will start a HN-Exiles invite only alternative and there would be only creators and no "priests". It is obvious that coexistence is no longer an option.
- skookumchuck 8y agoWhen I travel in Europe I see significantly higher prices for food than in the US.
- IanCal 8y agoI'm neither American, nor shocked at the idea that America has poverty. I am, however, a bit of a stickler actual information. Pointing to general issues does absolutely nothing to help source this claim. The claim was that ~65M people were in "who live in the most abject poverty seen in the developed world." The actual figure for a poverty measure is 43M. However, that's not what the claim was - it's not simply that people are in poverty but those that are are in "the most abject poverty seen in the developed world". Either we can find actual information and have a real discussion, or we can throw around vague unsourced claims and get nowhere.