4 ms·
I like a comment like this. It's free of fear, and knee-jerk response. I actually see your point. Some people may feel a sense of peace by being tightly constr
by mindfulhack 8y ago
I like a comment like this. It's free of fear, and knee-jerk response.
I actually see your point. Some people may feel a sense of peace by being tightly constricted by behavior that they're taught is OK to do, and what is not. In such a system, there's actually security in there. Some people love not having to decide how to live.
But this is what trumps your thought: people in China wouldn't even be able to HAVE the conversation you and I are having right now (about this very meta topic, about how to organize ourselves) - and therein lies the problem.
We objectively need certain individual civil freedoms, to even grow and develop as a society.
So for humanity's future, China sucks. Its ideas are archaic, and its totalitarianism ISN'T the way to go.
- sitkack 8y agoThey can have it, they just can't have it in a public forum where it can spread. Participate in no communicable memes!
- fwn 8y agoBut that is, at least in the Western concept of social iteration, the only way to scale & accelerate discourse. No public discourse is just no discourse for most of its purposes. (Except for maybe personal entertainment.)
- loa-in-backup 8y agoThere's peer to peer dissemination as well. A network spanning a whole country nonetheless