5 ms·
It’s easy to forget that Bill Gates was once the Jeff Dean of his time.
by ggg9990 8y ago
It’s easy to forget that Bill Gates was once the Jeff Dean of his time.
- copperx 8y agoBill Gates is a genius, maybe even in technical stuff, but he wasn't the Jeff Dean of his time.
- ggg9990 8y agoWell of course, in a way, nobody could be, because software didn’t have the impact on the world then as it does now.
- iainmerrick 8y agoI don't think that's entirely fair... It's true that computers and computerisation have never been so ubiquitous as they are now, but they've still been having a big impact for a long time. Off the top of my head, credit cards and ATMs, and the purchase tracking and credit scoring agencies they enabled, have been a big deal since the 60s, says Wikipedia. (I would have guessed later!) Can't do that without a lot of software.
- coldtea 8y agoI'd say it had more impact then. The major impact of software and computing was front-loaded, as in, it came with the early hanging fruits: being able to computerize banking, government data, credit card transactions, international trading, etc. This gave a huge boost to market efficiency and globalization. The rest, with the internet, apps, online sales, etc, is just another outlet for doing business. Whether a 2B2 order happens on the web, or by old-style computer networks, or even by fax, is not that much of a difference.
- snowwrestler 8y agoBill Gates had the strategic vision to see that software was not only going to be a viable industry, it was likely to be the most valuable computer industry. It seems like he was good but not a spectacular programmer himself. Barbarians Led By Bill Gates is a great book about the relatively early days of Microsoft--early enough that the book describes some instances of programmers finding and replacing Bill's code with better stuff. IIRC there is at least one story of a new guy going "who wrote this crappy code" and then finding out it was Gates.
- optimuspaul 8y agoI wouldn't even say Jeff Dean is the Bill Gates of today. But I'd say that would be a more correct statement.