3 ms·
> It's good to know that Aurora will try. It's not like it needs to be reliable or anything. "Reliable" isn't a binary concept. There's no service that is 100%
by chimeracoder 8y ago
> It's good to know that Aurora will try. It's not like it needs to be reliable or anything.
"Reliable" isn't a binary concept. There's no service that is 100% reliable.
Having a solution that works 99.99% of the time (which is "only" four nines) is probably good enough that people are willing to use it as a last-resort. (From what it seems, it's included for free, so it's not like this costs you anything anyway - at worst, you end up where you would be if they hadn't released this).
- ddorian43 8y agoIt's not free, look at "estimated 10$/month".
- barkingcat 8y agoNot free - there's even a pricing directly on the screenshot!
- amelius 8y agoIt has to be extremely reliable, simply because on large databases, it may take a considerable amount of time before you find out that something is wrong; and when you find out, it may be too late to fix things, even when you have backups.