13 ms·
Ask HN: What would you do with $100K cash?
I have around $50k sitting in a couple 401k accounts. The rest of my savings, somewhere around $100k, is sitting entirely in cash right now. In all likelihood, I'm not going to spend the time required doing research to invest any of it in individual stocks, so what should I do with it? Mutual funds, index funds, real estate, crypto?
- ainiriand 8y agoIt is my understanding that you want to achieve a certain amount of benefit in the long term, not short term, isn't it? If the answer is yes, you are absolutely right in not investing in individual stocks. Where can be Google in 20 years? Facebook? Tesla? You don't know and the owners don't know either. The first thing that comes to mind would be a mixed index/bond approach using Vanguard ETF's although any company will do. If you go for a conservative approach you could invest 50% Vanguard all US market ETF, 30% Vanguard Whole bond market ETF and 20% Rest of the world ETF market. In a more venturous approach you could move the 50% up to 60% while adjusting bond and ROW markets. I am a hobbist investor as well and I would very much like to see the rest of opinions.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- barry0079 8y agoDoes backpacking around the world interest you? Experience is a worthwhile investment.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- alpine_glass 8y agoYes, and I'm planning to take off for ~6 months next year to do just that. I should be able to set aside enough this year to fund that trip.
- staticautomatic 8y agoPut it in an IRA comprised of Vanguard index funds. Play with other investments in the future when you have more money.
- cimmanom 8y agoFWIW, IRA contribution limits are $5500/yr. You can't put $100k in an IRA all at once.
- staticautomatic 8y agoThe limits don't apply to rolling over a 401K into an IRA. They're for contributions to an already established IRA.
- cimmanom 8y agoOK, but the OP said they have $100K cash, not $100K in a 401K
- staticautomatic 8y agoYou're right. I misread. Thanks for pointing that out.
- baccredited 8y ago"I have $X, what should I do with it?" https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/wiki/commontopics https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/wiki/commontopics
- brudgers 8y ago[random financial advice from the internet] If you don't know what to do with it, don't do anything. Later, when you know what to do with it, you can do it. To put it another way, right now, you have insufficient information to make an informed decision. You'll have more information later, and if you don't spend the money now, $100k to put behind that informed decision.
- chatmasta 8y agoThis advice gets worse the longer you hold onto it in a place that provides lower returns than inflation. Leaving $100k in your savings account for 5 years is definitely not a good idea, for example. Compound interest works both ways.
- dale14 8y agoStart a company in something you love and master! And maybe use a small amount for a 3-month travel, you'll learn a lot!
- path101 8y agoDefinitely invest in a business idea of your own. Alternatively, invest in real estate.
- cimmanom 8y agoMy advice would be to echo those who suggest index funds or target retirement funds. BUT: there's reason to believe that the stock markets are currently near peak. Instead of investing all your money at once, you may want to do something called "dollar cost averaging", where you spread out your investment by putting a bit into the market every month for years. That way you get some of the benefit from a market that continues to rise in the short term but don't lose your shirt if it crashes hard three months from now.
- stouset 8y agoThere are always reasons to believe the market is at its peak and you should hold off. Time in the market beats timing the market. DCA is also worse than time in the market. http://awealthofcommonsense.com/2014/02/worlds-worst-market-timer/ http://awealthofcommonsense.com/2014/02/worlds-worst-market-...
- weltstub 8y agoThe link you provide says DCA would have been a better strategy. Doesn't mean it's the optimal strategy, but the link subverts your point.
- stouset 8y agoThe point of the link was that even having the actual worst market timing, you’re still doing great. So stop worrying and just put your money in. If you plan on investing large lump sums repeatedly and exclusively at market peaks, then yes, DCA will be a better strategy. But this is just as unlikely as you being a financial genius who only ever invests lump sums at market lows. Actually, given the upward trend line of the market, it’s slightly less likely.
- LUmBULtERA 8y agoVanguard VTSAX. Or the equivalent ETF with symbol VTI. This mirrors what others are saying, just a specific recommendation so you don't need to bother with much research. Total Stock Market Index fund with 0.04% expense ratio.
- crazypyro 8y agoIf you have 100k in cash, I feel like your 401k should be much higher. I would look at using the cash to supplement income so you can maximize your tax advantaged 401k savings. Otherwise, personally, I would put 60% in low cost index funds like Vanguard, 20% in bonds and 20% in crypto, but that's because I have a high risk tolerance.
- stouset 8y agoThis (minus the crypto suggestion). Maximize your 401(k) contributions. Max your Roth IRA (via backdoor if you make typical tech incomes). “Pay” yourself whatever shortfall is in your budget from these cash reserves.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoIf you have any debt (even a mortgage), I'd use it to pay it down.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- alpine_glass 8y agoMy student loans will be paid off within the next couple months. I have no other debt.
- vinceguidry 8y agoPut it down on a nice condo.
- psyc 8y agoI once had $100K in cash. I spent it trying to get a business off the ground. If I had it to do over again, I would most likely buy a house. If I didn't want to do that, I would stick it in Vanguard, and then promptly raise my 401k contributions.
- blizzyb 8y agoI'd buy rental properties. Invest out of state if it's too expensive where you live.
- thiago_fm 8y agoI will try to shortly give you a crash-course about how to invest. First of all. Warren Buffet, on his whole life made around 17% p.a. average returns. With 17% on your 100k, it's okayish money, but won't take you anywhere, even in a few decades. And his average will be much higher than yours, don't try to compete with him or a have high return. So, first give up that you can get rich by investing or that you can outperform the market by a wide-margin, or that you will even outperform it. What makes you rich is how much you can save and then convert it into assets that makes you money. With a few decades of saving an okay amount, investing like an adult you will get rich. So, focus on making more money and saving more. So, now, what to buy with the money you make? Don't try to make those calculations people do: Hmm. I will get this investment or this other because the other pays me 1% a.a. more. Instead, your goal is to beat inflation, always. That way, you aren't at least losing money. Now, there are different investment products. Stocks, ETFs, REITs, crypto, all the stuff you said. Do some small research and find all the stuff you are excited about: tesla, play monopoly(REITs?) etc. Get like 20 options at least, diversify a lot. Get also some government bounds and keep a percentage of your money as USD, so you can take opportunities. Go very diversified. Returns doesn't matter, losing money(vs inflation) does. Now, invest 5%(and strive to get even lower) on each. If you aren't confortable with stocks, get ETFs, multiple ones. Buy the obvious stuff: not the one everybody is buying, but also not the one not anybody wants to buy(only crazy people that feels it is a casino). Do the obvious. The more you diversify in different products, the better. Also, having money in your bank account is also good, as if the stock market crashes, your overall assets will definitely feel less pain. Avoid selling. Once you buy something, stick to the end. Does it sound stupid? Yes it does, but it will make sure you are always very diversified. If something keeps you awake at night because you fear losing more money, or any money at all, it just means you aren't diversified enough. Avoid trading, buying and selling or whatever, because that gives money to who owns the broker. The market will try to make you rotate your assets, don't fucking do it. It is a terrible idea. I've been doing the above and learning more about fundamental analysis of companies(stocks). I know how to read balances well and have had a performance better than S&P 500 on my overall assets, but I consider it partially luck. I only invest in stocks which can give constant profits, have a good free-float this and that. You don't need to learn this crap unless you want to. I do it for fun. If I do very well, I might make 2% p.a. than you, and this makes absolutely no difference in that amount of money. If I would instead learn how to do make wooden tables and sell them, I would make more money than what do I get 2% a.a. on my assets(and by now, I think I've accumulated a lot). Never buy into those early retirement schemes frugal lifestyle people try to sell you. It is all bullshit, it won't make you happy. Also, the most important thing: DO SPORTS. This is the best investment advice you will ever get. Get at least 3x a week physical activity, maybe even more. You can make muchhhhhhh more money by being alive for longer. Time will always beat returns, always! Also, having assets invested means you will carry some risk and the best way to deal with anxiety of risk is to practice sports. You might think that risk has to do with losing money, but it also happens when winning. Once I've made so much money with crypto(like years worth of work, even more!) that I couldn't sleep well, even though I do my sports and all and barely have any anxiety previously. Same happened other times, with AAPL stock... also lost some. So things will go up and down, if you are diversified, it won't hurt you much. With diversification, you can even safely take from the ATM 1% of your portifolio from the ATM and burn it in a party, just because you can, as it barely makes any difference as the market will slide up or down. But don't do it. There will be people and studies whatever that will tell you that diversifying too much is bad. It only is if you are paying too much to your broker to do it for you, as everytime you buy something, you pay some dollars for it. Those people who works for and own investment funds frequently don't even beat the market and charge lazy rich people that don't want to manage their own money. Don't trust them, ever! Just trust yourself. Don't buy the magazines that tell you what to buy, always do your own research and if you are to lazy, just diversify a lot. My 2 cents.
- bdcravens 8y agoI'd put $10k in crypto if you're prepared to lose it. (or whatever ratio you're comfortable with) I won't say it's a sure lock to go up, but given history, returns of X00% are likely at some point.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- ixacto 8y agoPut it all into VFIAX if you intend to hold onto it. Then forget about it for 20 years.
- bsvalley 8y ago2 things: 1. looks like you already have that money in cash, 2. also looks like you're saving a bit of money every month which is why you've reach that amount in savings? I'd do what others said and invest in S&P 500 index fund (Vanguard). But - I would personally go for a regular index fund and not an ETF because ETF's are too new in my opinion. Not enough history unlike VTSAX or VFIAX which are old enough, so I trust them a lot more (also a suggestion from Warren Buffett BTW). And - I would not use your $100K. That's the main difference... you already have this cash in hand, don't invest it. Keep it as a back up just in case you get in troubles for unexpected events in the future. $100K is a good amount for that because it's not too much but still a lot of money to survive. Indeed, start redirecting the money you save every month into your Vanguard index fund. That's it. Start doing that today, let's say $1000/month. Buy VTAX or VIAX with it every month no matter if the market goes down or up. It's called dollar cost averaging. Benefits with this strategy - You maintain a nice buying power (your $100K), you're pretty much secured in case something bad happens, if the market crashes tomorrow, not a problem, you're only investing brand new money. Worst case scenario is your best case scenario today = $100k. Plus by doing dollar cost averaging, it's actually good when the market goes down a bit because you end up buying more with your $1000/month at a lower price. That's it.
- eaenki 8y agoTwo options: 1- If you're Relentlessly Resourceful { find something at the intersection of what you're passionate about, a problem, and a global movement. Then, create a company around it. If you're frugal enough you've got a shot at failing with 3-5 products (however similar between them) with $100k } else { 2- pick 4-8 Tech and Biotech public companies w a 3-20B market cap w compelling visions that have initially been backed from top tier VCs. 1 example: BOX }
- b3b0p 8y agoI was in a similar situation. I put it all in Vanguard. I look at it maybe once or twice a year to only smile and see how well it does consistently over time. The monthly returns is a enough on average so far to pay my rent. That's a nice feeling.
- Jack000 8y agohere's my algorithm for my passive investments: - if rolling average of VIX is below 15, all in on vanguard - if it's above 15, choose from a basket of historically defensive stocks (Mcdonalds, Coke etc). Allocate more toward stocks with lower pearson correlation to the index in the past year. - add hysteresis to taste the idea is to avoid extended downturns while not really actively managing. This strategy backtests pretty well and it's what I use personally.