6 ms·
I wonder how many people use stuff like this to cheat the system? I remember seeing someone on reddit bragging about attaching their Fitbit to a reciprocating s
by kpwags 8y ago
I wonder how many people use stuff like this to cheat the system? I remember seeing someone on reddit bragging about attaching their Fitbit to a reciprocating saw to get more steps than his wife.
I couldn't figure out why it was that important, but with insurance discounts, I can definitely see the financial incentives.
- ams6110 8y agoA lot. I'd be surprised if any Business Management 101 class didn't teach that if there is a reward involved, people will maximize for whatever critera you measure.
- eli 8y agoGoodhart's law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."
- dragonwriter 8y agoThat's only true to the extent that the chosen measure was only coincidentally something that looked like a good measure to start with; if you were actually measuring the true feature of merit, making it a target wouldn't make it a bad measure. Making a measure a target incentivizes discovery of its deficiencies, if any, as a measure.
- pmichaud 8y agoI agree with you in the narrow sense, but I bet you can't think of a metric that should be hyper-focused on for any purpose. Even something like "Lives Saved" fails pretty hard if you do it hard enough.
- eli 8y agoWhat's an example of a metric that measures the true merit of something?
- Dylan16807 8y agoNo metric is perfect, but if you were measuring fat percentage in a moderately-accurate way it would be a very solid basis for an incentive.
- Johnny555 8y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobra_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobra_effect The term cobra effect originated in an anecdote set at the time of British rule of colonial India. The British government was concerned about the number of venomous cobra snakes in Delhi.[3] The government therefore offered bounty for every dead cobra. Initially this was a successful strategy as large numbers of snakes were killed for the reward. Eventually, however, enterprising people began to breed cobras for the income. When the government became aware of this, the reward program was scrapped, causing the cobra breeders to set the now-worthless snakes free. As a result, the wild cobra population further increased. The apparent solution for the problem made the situation even worse
- tzs 8y agoWhat did the Delhi residents themselves think about cobras? Were the natives OK with cobras running around and it was just the British that wanted to reduce the population? I'm curious because if everybody disliked wild cobras loose in the city I'd have expected the breeders to kill their stock when the bounty ended, not free it.
- emodendroket 8y agoWhy would you expect that in a world where people dump hazardous waste into rivers to save money?
- tedunangst 8y agoBecause dehazarding waste is more difficult than chopping up a snake?
- emodendroket 8y agoBut letting the snakes go is even easier. Use the example of people littering instead of using a trash can, or not flushing public toilets, if you need a demonstration of how people can't be bothered with even simple tasks.
- kevin_nisbet 8y agoReminds me of one of my favourite stories about this: https://www.inc.com/magazine/20081001/how-hard-could-it-be-sins-of-commissions.html?partner=fogcreek https://www.inc.com/magazine/20081001/how-hard-could-it-be-s...
- ryandrake 8y agoThis is probably true for all jobs and compensation schemes, but for some reason super true in Sales. Take a sales guy who failed middle school math, give him as complicated a salary/bonus structure as you can and overnight he will turn into Albert Einstein and optimize his behavior to produce the most money.
- bluedino 8y agoI worked in this space, and yes, if the employer offers an incentive, people will cheat. Even for something like a $10 Dunkin Donuts gift card (heck of a incentive for a health/wellness program). We'd go through logs and see people sequentially logging for each day, one team member after another, on the last day of the competition. You'd also find people scrutinizing the accuracy of any reporting we did as a company - some very odd bugs were found by companies with participants armed with Excel and too much time on their hands.
- sundvor 8y agoDonuts as a reward for physical activity - what the actual??
- sokoloff 8y ago"That's why little chocolate donuts have been on my training table since I was a kid..." https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/little-chocolate-donuts/n8655 https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/little-chocola...
- sundvor 8y agoGeographic Restriction This content is not available in your location.
- sokoloff 8y agoSorry. It's an old John Belushi Saturday Night Live sketch where he wins some Olympic-type events and then the voiceover claims that "little chocolate donuts" were part of his training regimen. Last shot is a picture of some fat, stubby fingers holding a half-smoked cigarette and reaching for another donut.
- sundvor 8y ago:) Thanks!
- Splines 8y agoPeople are willing to go quite far sometimes: https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/8fu7wi/albertan_changes_gender_to_save_25_on_car/ https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/8fu7wi/albertan_cha...
- userbinator 8y agoGender is a state of mind in Canada and therefore Alberta. If it catches on, it will probably stop working once the statistics reveal gender-changed MtoF's to be just as high in accident rates as regular males.
- geofft 8y agoAssuming that's what they reveal, yes. If accident rates are linked to testosterone levels, trans women taking hormone-replacement therapy should have statistically lower accident rates - and trans men taking hormone-replacement therapy should have statistically higher accident rates.
- fjsolwmv 8y agoBut HRT is not necessary for registering a legal Gender.
- geofft 8y agoThis feels like an abstracted form of arbitrage: the markets have figured out that there's a quantifiable risk difference between men and women, but they have not distinguished cis and trans folks in their model, and not figured out whether this is a hormones-at-birth difference, or a current-hormones difference, or a socialization difference, or what. They have also certainly not figured out how to distinguish actual trans folks from arbitrageurs (this is something that I think the law ought not to try too hard to figure out, on limited-government grounds, but the markets would love to take as much data as they can and feed it into a model). Once they figure it out, they'll price this person as a person, and he won't be able to swing it as dramatically. Gender is a pretty crude (though effective) axis to make this sort of risk distinction on. An insurance company that can accurately figure out which men are lower-risk to insure than the average man will probably have a pretty good time in the market. (And get a head start on any policy changes about not discriminating on gender.)