3 ms·
I think Lundgrens analysis is closer to the truth: “I got in the way of their agenda,” Lundgren said, “this profit model that’s way more profitable than I coul
by DoctorOetker 9y ago
I think Lundgrens analysis is closer to the truth:
“I got in the way of their agenda,” Lundgren said, “this profit model that’s way more profitable than I could ever be.”
On average judges defend the nation, money must flow up. The nation's tax income on Microsofts exploitation are bigger (or so thinks the judge) than the tax income on Lundger's (preventive) recycling business.
Your taxes represent your bullying/fleecing strength. When one tithe collector gets in an argument with another tithe collector, the goverment tends to agree with the tithe collector that brings the biggest tithes...
The population needs to be fleeced. The natural order of things and so on. So it is!
- whatshisface 9y agoJudges do not actually think about maximizing federal tax revenues when making their decisions. There might be something else that is going on to result in that, but judges have absolutely no incentives in that direction.