4 ms·
Tons of stuff about hashing (that we already know) and not much on ML hashing.
by ape4 9y ago
Tons of stuff about hashing (that we already know) and not much on ML hashing.
- oever 9y agoThe cuckoo hashing was new to me.
- 0xffff2 9y agoIt's oddly formatted (I thought it was a quote at first), but the article includes this: >(If you’re already familiar with hash tables, collision handling strategies, and hash function performance considerations; you might want to skip ahead, or skim this article and read the three articles linked at the end of this article for a deeper dive into these topics.)
- joe_the_user 9y agoI can't see how your statement can be true: "In response to the findings of the Google/MIT collaboration, Peter Bailis and a team of Stanford researchers went back to the basics and warned us not to throw out our algorithms book just yet. Bailis’ and his team at Stanford recreated the learned index strategy, and were able to achieve similar results without any machine learning by using a classic hash table strategy called Cuckoo Hashing" "We can do your ml hashing with ordinary hashing" is a statement about both ordinary hashing and ml hashing, indeed a fairly strong statement about each. Whether it's true is a different matter but to say "nothing about ml hashing" seems unsupportable.