> They start with a conclusion, the justification of race, and seek evidence to prove it. Of course, they find such evidence. Anyone looking to prove any conclu

> They start with a conclusion, the justification of race, and seek evidence to prove it. Of course, they find such evidence. Anyone looking to prove any conclusion can find evidence - even scientifically strong evidence. Can you point to scientifically strong evidence of anything which is also known to be false? I mean evidence which is still accepted as scientifically strong, not something that's been discredited. If not, then I think you've just argued that we can't use science to explain anything because it lets us choose any conclusion we want. I don't think you're trying to promote an anti-science ideology, so can you clarify that?