4 ms·
"pull" might be the first thing I'd throw out, if thought there was any hope of fixing git ux. Then add a working merge --dry-run #do i have conflicts?.
by e12e 9y ago
"pull" might be the first thing I'd throw out, if thought there was any hope of fixing git ux. Then add a working merge --dry-run #do i have conflicts?.
- aidenn0 9y agoI think a default of --ff-only would be fine for pull. This is great for when I'm merely a consumer of a project, and will never silently perform a merge or rebase.