4 ms·
So why don't industry cigarettes contain zeolite filters? Same question for activated charcoal filters. And don't say 'false sense of security', harm reduction
by no_identd 9y ago
So why don't industry cigarettes contain zeolite filters? Same question for activated charcoal filters. And don't say 'false sense of security', harm reduction is harm reduction is harm reduction.
- ricardobeat 9y agoCigarettes are already expensive, that would make them a luxury item.
- stochastic_monk 9y agoThey’re only expensive because they’re so heavily taxed. Putting some of that money to consumer health in the form of more advanced filters would be great harm reduction.
- _asummers 9y agoThat's not the right behavior to be encouraging at the macro public health level, though. The goal of the taxes is to discourage use, by making the cost outrageous, and while you can make them safer, ultimately you want to be discouraging their use entirely.
- dexterdog 9y agoThe taxes have the main goal of raising revenue for the government. Discouragement is just a side benefit.
- dsr_ 9y agoThat would depend on which government is doing the taxing. To the US states, tobacco taxes are revenue. For the Federal government, they are a policy measure.
- coldtea 9y ago>That's not the right behavior to be encouraging at the macro public health level, though. The goal of the taxes is to discourage use, by making the cost outrageous And why's that the government's business exactly? In a country that they actually offer free public healthcare, I'd understand it (sick people incur costs), but in the US and other such places, it's mostly the state playing nanny (even more so than the tax money).
- barrkel 9y agoBecause people vote for it? Smoking culture has a lot of knock on effects for third parties who aren't in a position to fix things themselves, children especially. I know; I grew up in a house with two smokers. Now I can scarcely handle visiting my parents' appartments.
- coldtea 9y ago>Because people vote for it? Really, like you ever got asked to vote "for it"? First, it's usually a wholesale vote: you only like this 1-2 things about the party's/candidate's platform? Sorry, you're getting those 200 other things too. And there's just 2 parties, so pick wisely, lest you get the one you really don't want. Not to mention that even for the things people explicitly vote for, they don't get. Empty promises is the name of the game... >Smoking culture has a lot of knock on effects for third parties who aren't in a position to fix things themselves, children especially. I know; I grew up in a house with two smokers. So, like almost everybody pre-90s? They seem to have come out alright...
- ricardobeat 9y ago> The cancer death rate for men and women combined fell 25% from its peak in 1991 to 2014 Attributed mainly to reduction in smoking. Also, the biparty system is peculiar to the US. Other countries have more fine-grained political platforms, and mostly end up with similar policies. Public health is, well, a public matter.
- ShabbosGoy 9y ago
- no_identd 9y agoDidn't I just say "don't say 'false sense of security'"? :P
- detaro 9y agoZeolites are in cat litter and laundry detergents, they are made industrially at massive scale. Cost probably isn't the issue here.
- jimmies 9y agoMake the cigarette buds reusable then (and ban those one-time use buds, if possible).
- ricardobeat 9y agoE-cigarettes are already a thing.