3 ms·

>In every somewhat serious company I've worked they used a local npm If that was the case for everybody, then left-pad would not have caused a problem for anyb

>In every somewhat serious company I've worked they used a local npm If that was the case for everybody, then left-pad would not have caused a problem for anybody. People would not notice anything wrong with their builds. The amount of github comments where people say that their production build just broke because of a missing package implies that people are NOT using NPM with a local registry >in the official npm registry you can only unpublish within the first 24 hours of publishing I don't believe this to be the case https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16087024 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16087024

twelve40 9y ago
Just because it's a shitty common practice doesn't mean there isn't a proper way to do it (local repo). For example, there are tons of people who check in their secrets into public and private Github repos (including Uber eng), then they get jacked and complain. If they were smarter than that, "it would not have caused a problem for anybody". Doesn't really prove that what a lot of people do must be automatically good.
- kkapelon 9y ago
  True, but the fact that NPM seems to be the only repository where packages can be "re-published" further exacerbates the bad practices. https://status.npmjs.org/incidents/41zfb8qpvrdj https://status.npmjs.org/incidents/41zfb8qpvrdj The fact that 9 packages could be "published over" _after_ the left-pad fiasco, shows lack of attention. Tools should try to foster good practices, instead of worsening bad ones.