3 ms·
Their hope is that maybe they'll be able to change the future for the better by making an example of someone, even if they have to be excessive, cruel, or unjus
by sexoffender 9y ago
Their hope is that maybe they'll be able to change the future for the better by making an example of someone, even if they have to be excessive, cruel, or unjust toward that person. They're justifying the means by the hoped end.
- blackbagboys 9y agoA more prosaic and more likely explanation is that states controlled by the Republican party seek to suppress black voting by any means possible because it's a threat to their hold on power.
- cgriswald 9y agoI find that explanation unlikely. First, the vast majority of states have some type of voting restrictions on felons, with Maine and Vermont being the only exceptions. Second, some states historically and modernly controlled by the Republican party (e.g. Montana) return the right to vote after release. Third, among states with harsher restrictions (ending after parole or probation) that are historically OR modernly Republican controlled (ignoring the first point-that many such states are Democrat controlled), the demographics are, in many cases, such that all other races combined could not muster even the perception of a threat to the white, Republican voting bloc.
- s2g 9y agoTossing her in prison for 5 years as part of a "crackdown" on voter fraud in an effort to prove it is a problem, and then disenfranchise as a "correction", is a pure republican move.
- s2g 9y agoTheir version of better is a dystopian nightmare.