2 ms·

Well, you know when you think everyone else is wrong and you're right - that's the definition of crazy. I'm not insulting you, as text doesn't convey that I say

by eloff 9y ago

Well, you know when you think everyone else is wrong and you're right - that's the definition of crazy. I'm not insulting you, as text doesn't convey that I say that with a smile, but you should consider that it's far more likely that you are actually the one who's wrong.

seanmcdirmid 9y ago
Going or not going with the crowd is a poor definition of craziness. Instead, consider the candidate thinking logically (e.g. do they believe P&&!P is true) or critically. Do they have reasonable arguments or do they go in circles, etc...
- eloff 9y ago
  You're taking me too literally. If I say you're crazy with a smile, I don't mean your mentally ill, I mean your ideas are out of the ordinary.
poelzi 9y ago
One thing I can say for certain: I could have never come up with this model. I'm merely a student of it and so far, it was not contradicted like most other models I encountered so far. Models that are not falsifiable, like string theory go directly to the trash bin for me. Secondly, I know for absolute certainty that most models we believe in, are wrong if you take the combined perceptive into account. There are nutjobs out there how actually believe there is a difference between physics, chemistry and astrophysics. Every model that has paradoxes must have errors. So, please, falsify it for me, I take logical or mathematical arguments as well as publicly accepted measurements interpreted under this model. Everything else is just bullshit. Just because many people believe something does not make it right, in fact history has shown the opposite (if it concerns natural sciences). https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitation-Unified/dp/1412083877 https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitat... This is the only more or less complete description of the model, if you think it's to expensive, and still want to falsify it (please do), I can give you a pdf. Take into account that you will need a year or so to really grasp it, it's a thick book with quite dense content.
- eloff 9y ago
  It's one thing to discount a particular theory, is another all together to discount a huge number of them. Without understanding anything of your model versus the scientific consensus, I can easily say your odds aren't looking good. That's just statistics. Still, that's exactly the kind of thinking that pushes science forward when it's well reasoned and takes into account all of the observations. Where your model falls on that spectrum I cannot say.

by eloff 9y ago

seanmcdirmid 9y ago

Going or not going with the crowd is a poor definition of craziness. Instead, consider the candidate thinking logically (e.g. do they believe P&&!P is true) or critically. Do they have reasonable arguments or do they go in circles, etc...

eloff 9y ago
You're taking me too literally. If I say you're crazy with a smile, I don't mean your mentally ill, I mean your ideas are out of the ordinary.

poelzi 9y ago

One thing I can say for certain: I could have never come up with this model. I'm merely a student of it and so far, it was not contradicted like most other models I encountered so far. Models that are not falsifiable, like string theory go directly to the trash bin for me. Secondly, I know for absolute certainty that most models we believe in, are wrong if you take the combined perceptive into account. There are nutjobs out there how actually believe there is a difference between physics, chemistry and astrophysics. Every model that has paradoxes must have errors. So, please, falsify it for me, I take logical or mathematical arguments as well as publicly accepted measurements interpreted under this model. Everything else is just bullshit. Just because many people believe something does not make it right, in fact history has shown the opposite (if it concerns natural sciences). https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitation-Unified/dp/1412083877 https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitat... This is the only more or less complete description of the model, if you think it's to expensive, and still want to falsify it (please do), I can give you a pdf. Take into account that you will need a year or so to really grasp it, it's a thick book with quite dense content.

eloff 9y ago
It's one thing to discount a particular theory, is another all together to discount a huge number of them. Without understanding anything of your model versus the scientific consensus, I can easily say your odds aren't looking good. That's just statistics. Still, that's exactly the kind of thinking that pushes science forward when it's well reasoned and takes into account all of the observations. Where your model falls on that spectrum I cannot say.