3 ms·
That would fly in the face of a couple hundred years of law. That aside - in most cases no laws that existed at the time were violated, so its not as if he kno
by Aloha 9y ago
That would fly in the face of a couple hundred years of law.
That aside - in most cases no laws that existed at the time were violated, so its not as if he knowingly violated the law - TCE for example was not known to be harmful until the mid-70's, was not known to be environmentally persistent until even later, and was not declared a carcinogen until 2005.
Imagine that you're a cofounder of a company that made billions - but you personally didnt benefit much from it - beyond a paycheck - is it fair for you to be personally responsible for that environmental damage, or should the government go after the company you worked for?
Superfund is set up to follow the money, the money that Intel, and the successors of Fairchild has, wildly exceed the money the founders made.
- dekhn 9y agoI'm not sure what laws you're talking about, the Superfund law: applies liability to corporate owners who commit gross negligence, and in this case, Moore was a corporate owner. Corporate officers are specifically the people who are on the legal hook.