4 ms·

I never understood this. They casually suggest they can solve the energy crisis but think the big break-though will be making it compact? Its like saying I can

I never understood this. They casually suggest they can solve the energy crisis but think the big break-though will be making it compact? Its like saying I can turn lead into gold but I'm waiting for the travel version? It makes no sense.

IshKebab 9y ago
It does because the non-compact version is ITER and that costs $50bn. Smaller = cheaper.
- kortex 9y ago
  Smaller = cheaper and faster to build = more iterations = faster learning about these systems.