4 ms·
"right now" - Probably not. But with something like fusion for free energy would could just start pulling carbon from the atmosphere, we could start to transmut
by runj__ 9y ago
"right now" - Probably not. But with something like fusion for free energy would could just start pulling carbon from the atmosphere, we could start to transmute elements, it would be great for interstellar travel and energy would be the limiting factor of a global AI.
- bewo001 9y agoFusion power will be as 'free' as wind power. Both technologies struggle with high installation cost that has to be distributed over the number of customers and the lifetime of the plant. For fission power, the installation is already too high to compete with wind.
- solarkraft 9y agobut fusion throws out lots of energy. the argument is that the energy will be very very cheap compared to the installation cost (because you just get so much).
- bewo001 9y agoFusion reactors also consume a lot of energy. ITER plans to have a gain factor of 10, making 500MW of heat -- not electricity -- out of 50MW. According to wikipedia, a gain factor of 22 would be needed for commercial operation. The record is a gain factor of 0.67.. If fusion will ever become economically viable is an open question.
- Nomentatus 9y agoBut that gain factor declines steeply if sunk costs decline, as they would for smaller reactors producing more energy per pound installed.
- Robotbeat 9y agoFission also throws out a lot of energy, and the plus side is it's much easier to get to work (which is also the drawback...). ...and that's a good point. After working on fusion for a while, fission certainly looks attractive! I mean, it just works! And for all the hemming and hawing about safety, it's actually remarkably safe (in real terms) compared to just about any other energy source.