6 ms·
Because thats his perogative?
by drharby 9y ago
Because thats his perogative?
- saudioger 9y agoprerogative, and yeah - if you're the richest person on the planet it would be nice if the employees that got you there weren't living paycheck to paycheck.
- chii 9y agobut he may not be so rich if his workers didn't live paycheck to paycheck...
- PhasmaFelis 9y agoI don't understand why you think this is a good argument. There are plenty of things people are allowed to do that they really shouldn't.
- drharby 9y agoIts not a justification, it is a matter of fact that his decision making is not dependent on the masses' value system outside the realm of law. Thats what anti trust laws are for. I perceive any such talk that he should spend his money a certain way as propaganda.
- PhasmaFelis 9y agoSo your argument is "anything you can legally get away with is morally acceptable"?
- drharby 9y agoThere is NO ARGUMENT. An argument posits that there is a factual inconsistency that needs to be clarified through dialogue. What you are proposing is a debate. I AM NOT DEBATING - I am stating the fact that in American society the people have political vehicles to enforce cultural morality as codified through law. And i continue this dialogue because it is important for people to recognize that using morality as a metric is arbitrary when discussion such matters necause at the end of the day morality varies from pers9n to person and culture to culture
- PhasmaFelis 9y agoThat's...not how debate works. You can't just declare that you're not debating while continuing to debate, at least not when we're debating matters of opinion like moral responsibilities.
- drharby 9y agoYou are clearly filtering my messages. I have zero desire pursuing this alleged dialogue. All i am trying to communicate is that he can do what ever he wants.
- PhasmaFelis 9y ago> I have zero desire pursuing this alleged dialogue. And yet you keep doing it.